Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26608242›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

Perception drives production across sensory modalities: A network for sensorimotor integration of visual speech.

Jonathan H Venezia, Paul Fillmore, William Matchin, A Lisette Isenberg, Gregory Hickok, Julius Fridriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Benefit of visual speech information for word comprehension in post-stroke aphasia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Increased Connectivity among Sensory and Motor Regions during Visual and Audiovisual Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan H VeneziaDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, United States. Electronic address: jvenezia@uci.edu.
Paul FillmoreDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, United States.
William MatchinDepartment of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
A Lisette IsenbergDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.
Gregory HickokDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, United States.

Funding

Integrative Functions of the Planum TemporaleR01DC009659 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HICKOK, GREGORY, SABERI, KOUROSH · 2009 to 2020
$5.1M
A Unified Neuroanatomical Model of Speech Production and Perception: ImplicationsR01DC009571 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS, RORDEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC009571NIDCD NIH HHS DC009659NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009571NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory information is critical for movement control, both for defining the targets of actions and providing feedback during planning or ongoing movements. This holds for speech motor control as well, where both auditory and somatosensory information have been shown to play a key role. Recent clinical research demonstrates that individuals with severe speech production deficits can show a dramatic improvement in fluency during online mimicking of an audiovisual speech signal suggesting the existence of a visuomotor pathway for speech motor control. Here we used fMRI in healthy individuals to identify this new visuomotor circuit for speech production. Participants were asked to perceive and covertly rehearse nonsense syllable sequences presented auditorily, visually, or audiovisually. The motor act of rehearsal, which is prima facie the same whether or not it is cued with a visible talker, produced different patterns of sensorimotor activation when cued by visual or audiovisual speech (relative to auditory speech). In particular, a network of brain regions including the left posterior middle temporal gyrus and several frontoparietal sensorimotor areas activated more strongly during rehearsal cued by a visible talker versus rehearsal cued by auditory speech alone. Some of these brain regions responded exclusively to rehearsal cued by visual or audiovisual speech. This result has significant implications for models of speech motor control, for the treatment of speech output disorders, and for models of the role of speech gesture imitation in development.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetSpeechSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAudiovisual speechfMRIMultisensory integrationSensorimotor integrationSpeech production

Identifiers

PMID26608242
PMCPMC4733636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.