Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26608057›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Repetitive DNA and Plant Domestication: Variation in Copy Number and Proximity to Genes of LTR-Retrotransposons among Wild and Cultivated Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Genotypes.

Flavia Mascagni, Elena Barghini, Tommaso Giordani, Loren H Rieseberg, Andrea Cavallini, Lucia Natali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative Analysis of Active LTR Retrotransposons in Sunflower (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Singular Evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. On the Trail ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Copy Number Variation of Transposable Elements inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Flavia MascagniDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Elena BarghiniDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Tommaso GiordaniDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Loren H RiesebergThe Biodiversity Research Centre and Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Andrea CavalliniDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Lucia NataliDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy lucia.natali@unipi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sunflower (Helianthus annuus) genome contains a very large proportion of transposable elements, especially long terminal repeat retrotransposons. However, knowledge on the retrotransposon-related variability within this species is still limited. We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies to perform a quantitative and qualitative survey of intraspecific variation of the retrotransposon fraction of the genome across 15 genotypes--7 wild accessions and 8 cultivars--of H. annuus. By mapping the Illumina reads of the 15 genotypes onto a library of sunflower long terminal repeat retrotransposons, we observed considerable variability in redundancy among genotypes, at both superfamily and family levels. In another analysis, we mapped Illumina paired reads to two sets of sequences, that is, long terminal repeat retrotransposons and protein-encoding sequences, and evaluated the extent of retrotransposon proximity to genes in the sunflower genome by counting the number of paired reads in which one read mapped to a retrotransposon and the other to a gene. Large variability among genotypes was also ascertained for retrotransposon proximity to genes. Both long terminal repeat retrotransposon redundancy and proximity to genes varied among retrotransposon families and also between cultivated and wild genotypes. Such differences are discussed in relation to the possible role of long terminal repeat retrotransposons in the domestication of sunflower.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsRetroelementsSelection, GeneticTerminal Repeat SequencesGenes, PlantGenotypeHelianthusRetroelementsHelianthus annuuslong terminal repeat retrotransposonsplant domesticationrepetitive DNAretrotransposon redundancy

Identifiers

PMID26608057
PMCPMC4700961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.