Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26607985›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Agreement of Direct Antifungal Susceptibility Testing from Positive Blood Culture Bottles with the Conventional Method for Candida Species.

Kauser Jabeen, Haresh Kumar, Joveria Farooqi, Raunaq Mehboob, Mary E Brandt, Afia Zafar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antifungal Activity of Natural Compounds vs.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Can We Improve Antifungal Susceptibility Testing?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  6. Evaluation of Identification and Susceptibility forInternational journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kauser JabeenSection of Microbiology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan kausar.jabeen@aku.edu.
Haresh KumarSection of Microbiology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Joveria FarooqiSection of Microbiology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Raunaq MehboobSection of Microbiology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mary E BrandtMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Afia ZafarSection of Microbiology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aga Khan University · PKCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early availability of antifungal susceptibilities can ensure timely institution of targeted therapy in candidemia, which can improve patient outcomes. This study prospectively determines the agreement between the results of direct testing of antifungal susceptibilities from blood culture bottles by disk diffusion and Etest and the results of standardized susceptibility testing methods; direct testing would allow susceptibility results to be available 1 to 2 days earlier. A total of 104 blood cultures with different Candida species (28% C. albicans, 27% C. parapsilosis, 26% C. tropicalis, etc.) were evaluated between January 2012 and May 2013 for agreement of fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B susceptibility results by disk diffusion. Agreement in MICs obtained by Etest was determined for fluconazole (21 isolates), voriconazole (28 isolates), amphotericin (29 isolates), and caspofungin (29 isolates). The kappa scores for categorical agreement were highest for fluconazole by disk diffusion (0.902, standard error [SE] = 0.076) and Etest (1.00, SE = 0.218) and for amphotericin B by disk diffusion (1.00, SE = 0.098). The Pearson correlation (r) of zone diameters was strongest for fluconazole (0.69) and amphotericin (0.70) and moderate for voriconazole (0.60), and the Pearson correlation of MICs was strongest for fluconazole (0.94) and caspofungin (0.88). However, the moderate correlation of amphotericin MICs with zone diameters (-0.42) precludes the use of amphotericin B disk diffusion for susceptibility testing. There were no very major errors; however, there were 1 (1%) major and 5 (4.8%) minor errors with disk diffusion and 4 (13.3%) minor errors with Etest. Thus, antifungal disk diffusion directly from blood culture bottles is a rapid and easy method for fluconazole and voriconazole susceptibility testing for timely tailoring of candidemia therapy.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID26607985
PMCPMC4733185
OpenAlexW2176578070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.