Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26607910›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2016

Comparison Impairments of Spatial Cognition and Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity Between Prenatal and Postnatal Melamine Exposure in Male Adult Rats.

Lei An, Tao Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Dlg Is Required for Short-Term Memory and Interacts with NMDAR in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei AnCollege of Life Sciences and Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials Ministry of Education, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, People's Republic of China. al_totti@sina.com.
Tao ZhangCollege of Life Sciences and Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials Ministry of Education, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, People's Republic of China. zhangtao@nankai.edu.cn.
Nankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous investigation showed that melamine in offspring hippocampus appeared to not be the critical factor for cognitive defects. The present study was to investigate whether the cognitive impairments induced by prenatal and postnatal melamine exposure and persisted into adulthood, and to evaluate the differences of the exposures in affecting hippocampus-depended cognition and synaptic plasticity. Wistar rats were exposed to melamine through the whole gestational period or from postnatal day (PD) 21 to PD41, and then tested on PD90. The experiments of water maze and hippocampal synaptic plasticity in vivo were performed to assess the effects on spatial cognition and synaptic impairments. The results indicated that cognitive defects were induced by exposures to either prenatal or postnatal melamine, whereas there was a more serious damage in prenatal. Histological evidence further showed that there were the detrimental effects of both prenatal and postnatal effects. Paired-pulse facilitation ratio and post-tetanic potentiation were severely impacted in prenatal-exposed rats but not postnatal-exposed ones. Both exposures to prenatal and postnatal melamine impaired long-term potentiation, while there was severe damage to prenatal animals. These data suggest that the detrimental effects of prenatal and postnatal melamine on cognition and hippocampal synaptic plasticity could persist into adulthood, and the impairment of prenatal exposure was to some extent more severe. Hence, prenatal and postnatal exposures to melamine may have different effects on hippocampus-dependent learning and memory, which would most likely result from differentially adversely properties on the hippocampal CA1 synaptic function.

Indexed as

AnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalCognitionExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleMaleMaze LearningMotor ActivityNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRatsRats, WistarSpatial LearningTriazinesmelamineTriazinesAdultCognitionMelaminePostnatalPrenatalRatsSynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID26607910
OpenAlexW2178783545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.