Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26607762›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Evaluation of recruitment methods for a trial targeting childhood obesity: Families for Health randomised controlled trial.

J Fleming, A Kamal, E Harrison, T Hamborg, S Stewart-Brown, M Thorogood, F Griffiths, W Robertson

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Facilitators and barriers of children's participation in nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J FlemingWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. j.l.m.fleming@warwick.ac.uk.
A KamalWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. Atiya.Kamal@warwick.ac.uk.
E HarrisonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. E.P.Harrison.1@warwick.ac.uk.
T HamborgWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. T.Hamborg@warwick.ac.uk.
S Stewart-BrownWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. sarah.stewart-brown@warwick.ac.uk.
M ThorogoodWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. m.thorogood@warwick.ac.uk.
F GriffithsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. f.e.griffiths@warwick.ac.uk.
W RobertsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. w.robertson@warwick.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health 09/127/41Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruitment to trials evaluating the effectiveness of childhood obesity management interventions is challenging. We report our experience of recruitment to the Families for Health study, a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a family-based community programme for children aged 6-11 years, versus usual care. We evaluated the effectiveness of active recruitment (contacting eligible families directly) versus passive recruitment (informing the community through flyers, public events, media).

methodsInitial approaches included passive recruitment via the media (newspapers and radio) and two active recruitment methods: National Child Measurement Programme (letters to families with overweight children) and referrals from health-care professionals. With slow initial recruitment, further strategies were employed, including active (e.g. targeted letters from general practices) and passive (e.g. flyers, posters and public events) methods. At first enquiry from a potential participant, families were asked where they heard about the study. Further quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative data (one-to-one interviews with parents/carers), were collected from recruited families at baseline and 3-month follow-up and included questions about recruitment.

resultsIn total, 194 families enquired about Families for Health, and 115 (59.3 %) were recruited and randomised. Active recruitment yielded 85 enquiries, with 43 families recruited (50.6 %); passive recruitment yielded 99 enquiries with 72 families recruited (72.7 %). Information seen at schools or GP surgeries accounted for over a quarter of enquiries (28.4 %) and over a third (37.4 %) of final recruitment. Eight out of ten families who enquired this way were recruited. Media-led enquiries were low (5 %), but all were recruited. Children of families recruited actively were more likely to be Asian or mixed race. Despite extensive recruitment methods, the trial did not recruit as planned, and was awarded a no-cost extension to complete the 12-month follow-up.

conclusionsThe higher number of participants recruited through passive methods may be due to the large number of potential participants these methods reached and because participants may see the information more than once. Recruiting to a child obesity treatment study is complex and it is advisable to use multiple recruitment strategies, some aiming at blanket coverage and some targeted at families with children who are overweight.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN45032201 (Date: 18 August 2011).

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesFamilyPatient SelectionResearch SubjectsAdvertisingChildCorrespondence as TopicEnglandFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMass MediaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePediatric ObesityQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26607762
PMCPMC4660776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.