ReviewWorld journal of urology2016
Is robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal diversion becoming the new gold standard of care?
Review in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative outcomes of intracorporeal and extracorporeal urinary diversion in robotic cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Complications and health-related quality of life after robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of four RCTs.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Global trends in robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Pre-Op Hydronephrosis Predicts Outcomes in Patients Receiving Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy.Cancers · 2024Article
- Initial Experience of Hybrid Technique in Robot-Assisted Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit.Turkish journal of urology · 2022Article
- Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Comparison of open and intracorporeal modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz II) after laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bladder cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Current evidence for robotic surgery in radical cystectomy.Turkish journal of urology · 2021Review
- Do patients benefit from total intracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy?: A comparative analysis with extracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy from a Korean multicenter study.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020Article
- Utility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2019Review
- Robot-sewn ileoileal anastomosis during robot-assisted cystectomy.World journal of urology · 2018Article
- Robotic radical cystectomy: intracorporeal versus extracorporeal versus orthotopic neobladder-Which is better?World journal of urology · 2016Article
- Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.Current urology reports · 2016Review
- Evolving concepts in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.World journal of urology · 2016Article
- Advances in surgical management of muscle invasive bladder cancer.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTotally intracorporeal robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has perceived difficulties compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC). As the technique is increasingly adopted around the world, the benefits of RARC with intra- or extracorporeal urinary diversion or ORC for the patients are still unclear. In this article, we consider the current evidence for this issue.
methodsWe assessed two questions through using expert opinion and the medical literature: (A) Is RARC better than ORC for removing the cancer surgery and outcome? (B) Is RARC better than ORC for the urinary diversion? OUTCOMES: (A) RARC is better than ORC for shorter length of stay, blood loss and complication rates. (B) Intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder may have a significant physiological and surgical benefit to the patient recovery.
conclusionsRARC with total intracorporeal reconstruction has potential benefits to the patient. We recommend that all surgeons document patient-related outcome measures, urodynamics and enhanced recovery protocols for cystectomy patients to help us understand the real improvements within bladder cancer surgery and reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.