Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26607497›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Exploiting a moment of weakness: male spiders escape sexual cannibalism by copulating with moulting females.

Gabriele Uhl, Stefanie M Zimmer, Dirk Renner, Jutta M Schneider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Olfaction with legs-Spiders use wall-pore sensilla for pheromone detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mating behaviour and behavioural ecology of a Predatory Wasp,Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sperm competition when transfer is dangerous.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Sex differences in spiders: from phenotype to genomics.Development genes and evolution · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Risky business: males choose more receptive adults over safer subadults in a cannibalistic spider.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriele UhlGeneral and Systematic Zoology, Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Greifswald 17489; Germany.
Stefanie M ZimmerZoological Institute, Biocenter Grindel, University of Hamburg, Hamburg 20146; Germany.
Dirk RennerGeneral and Systematic Zoology, Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Greifswald 17489; Germany.
Jutta M SchneiderZoological Institute, Biocenter Grindel, University of Hamburg, Hamburg 20146; Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEZoological Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual cannibalism is a particularly extreme example of conflict between the sexes, depriving the male of future reproduction. Theory predicts that sexual conflict should induce counter-adaptations in the victim. Observations of male spiders mating with moulting and hence largely immobile females suggest that this behaviour functions to circumvent female control and cannibalism. However, we lack quantitative estimates of natural frequencies and fitness consequences of these unconventional matings. To understand the importance of mating while moulting in cannibalistic mating systems, we combined mating experiments and paternity assessment in the laboratory with extensive field observations using the sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider Argiope bruennichi. Copulations with moulting females resulted in 97% male survival compared with only 20% in conventional matings. Mating while moulting provided similar paternity benefits compared with conventional matings. Our findings support the hypothesis that mating with moulting females evolved under sexual conflict and safely evades sexual cannibalism. Despite male benefits, natural frequencies were estimated around 44% and directly predicted by a male guarding a subadult female. Since only adult females signal their presence, the difficulty for males to locate subadult females might limit further spreading of mating with moulting females.

Indexed as

CannibalismAnimalsCopulationMaleMoltingReproductionSpiders

Identifiers

PMID26607497
PMCPMC4660273
OpenAlexW2175082967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.