Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26607319›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. A2016

Tracking matrix effects in the analysis of DNA adducts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Joshua J Klaene, Caroline Flarakos, James Glick, Jennifer T Barret, Helmut Zarbl, Paul Vouros

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Chemical Analysis of DNA Damage.Analytical chemistry · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Future of DNA Adductomic Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Human Biomonitoring of DNA Adducts by Ion Trap Multistage Mass Spectrometry.Current protocols in nucleic acid chemistry · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua J KlaeneDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Caroline FlarakosDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
James GlickDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jennifer T BarretGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Helmut ZarblGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; NIEHS Center for Environmental Exposures and Disease, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Paul VourosDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology and Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: p.vouros@neu.edu.
Northeastern University · USEnvironmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI ROBERT John LAUMBACH · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
TRAINING IN EVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGYT32ES007148 · NIEHS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI Lauren M Aleksunes · 1987 to 2026
$11.4M
LC-MS Analysis of DNA Adducts of Aromatic Amines: Relationship to Bladder CancerR01CA069390 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI VOUROS, PAUL · 1996 to 2013
$2.7M
Relating DNA Adducts and ToxicogenomicsR01CA112231 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI VOUROS, PAUL · 2005 to 2009
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA069390NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112231NCI NIH HHS R01CA112231NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022NIEHS NIH HHS P30ES005022NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007148NIEHS NIH HHS T32ES007148PHS HHS R01 069390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LC-MS using electrospray ionization is currently the method of choice in bio-organic analysis covering a wide range of applications in a broad spectrum of biological media. The technique is noted for its high sensitivity but one major limitation that hinders achievement of its optimal sensitivity is the signal suppression due to matrix inferences introduced by the presence of co-extracted compounds during the sample preparation procedure. The analysis of DNA adducts of common environmental carcinogens is particularly sensitive to such matrix effects as sample preparation is a multistep process which involves "contamination" of the sample due to the addition of enzymes and other reagents for digestion of the DNA in order to isolate the analyte(s). This problem is further exacerbated by the need to reach low levels of quantitation (LOQ in the ppb level) while also working with limited (2-5 μg) quantities of sample. We report here on the systematic investigation of ion signal suppression contributed by each individual step involved in the sample preparation associated with the analysis of DNA adducts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) using as model analyte BaP-dG, the deoxyguanosine (dG) adduct of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP). The individual matrix contribution of each one of these sources to analyte signal was systematically addressed as were any interactive effects. The information was used to develop a validated analytical protocol for the target biomarker at levels typically encountered in vivo using as little as 2 μg of DNA and applied to a dose response study using a metabolically competent cell line.

Indexed as

7,8-Dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene 9,10-oxideBenzo(a)pyreneCarcinogens, EnvironmentalCells, CulturedChromatography, LiquidDeoxyguanosineDNA AdductsHumansMass SpectrometryPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons7,8-Dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene 9,10-oxide7,8-dihydroxy-9,10-epoxide-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene-10-deoxyguanosineBenzo(a)pyrenebenzo(a)pyrene-DNA adductCarcinogens, EnvironmentalDeoxyguanosineDNA AdductsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsBenzo[a]pyreneDNA adductsIon suppressionMatrix effectsPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID26607319
PMCPMC4789121
OpenAlexW1863155309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.