ArticleJournal of chromatography. A2016
Tracking matrix effects in the analysis of DNA adducts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Article in Journal of chromatography. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- HopE and HopD Porin-Mediated Drug Influx Contributes to Intrinsic Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Inhibits Streptomycin Resistance Acquisition by Natural Transformation in Helicobacter pylori.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- DNA adducts: Formation, biological effects, and new biospecimens for mass spectrometric measurements in humans.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2020Review
- Methyl DNA phosphate adduct formation in lung tumor tissue and adjacent normal tissue of lung cancer patients.Carcinogenesis · 2019Article
- Emerging Technologies in Mass Spectrometry-Based DNA Adductomics.High-throughput · 2019Review
- Differential Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (DMS-MS) in Radiation Biodosimetry: Rapid and High-Throughput Quantitation of Multiple Radiation Biomarkers in Nonhuman Primate Urine.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2018Article
- Chemical Analysis of DNA Damage.Analytical chemistry · 2018Review
- Ultrasensitive High-Resolution Mass Spectrometric Analysis of a DNA Adduct of the Carcinogen Benzo[a]pyrene in Human Lung.Analytical chemistry · 2017Article
- Data-Independent Mass Spectrometry Approach for Screening and Identification of DNA Adducts.Analytical chemistry · 2017Article
- The Future of DNA Adductomic Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Recommendations for quantitative analysis of small molecules by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry.Journal of chromatography. A · 2017Review
- Human Biomonitoring of DNA Adducts by Ion Trap Multistage Mass Spectrometry.Current protocols in nucleic acid chemistry · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
LC-MS using electrospray ionization is currently the method of choice in bio-organic analysis covering a wide range of applications in a broad spectrum of biological media. The technique is noted for its high sensitivity but one major limitation that hinders achievement of its optimal sensitivity is the signal suppression due to matrix inferences introduced by the presence of co-extracted compounds during the sample preparation procedure. The analysis of DNA adducts of common environmental carcinogens is particularly sensitive to such matrix effects as sample preparation is a multistep process which involves "contamination" of the sample due to the addition of enzymes and other reagents for digestion of the DNA in order to isolate the analyte(s). This problem is further exacerbated by the need to reach low levels of quantitation (LOQ in the ppb level) while also working with limited (2-5 μg) quantities of sample. We report here on the systematic investigation of ion signal suppression contributed by each individual step involved in the sample preparation associated with the analysis of DNA adducts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) using as model analyte BaP-dG, the deoxyguanosine (dG) adduct of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP). The individual matrix contribution of each one of these sources to analyte signal was systematically addressed as were any interactive effects. The information was used to develop a validated analytical protocol for the target biomarker at levels typically encountered in vivo using as little as 2 μg of DNA and applied to a dose response study using a metabolically competent cell line.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.