Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26607155›Full record

ArticleHNO2015

[A software tool for pure-tone audiometry: Classification of audiograms for inclusion of patients in clinical trials. German version].

T Rahne, F Buthut, S Plößl, S K Plontke

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T RahneUniversitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, Halle (Saale), Deutschland. torsten.rahne@uk-halle.de.
F ButhutUniversitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
S PlößlUniversitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
S K PlontkeUniversitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSelecting subjects for clinical trials on hearing loss therapies relies on the patient meeting the audiological inclusion criteria. In studies on the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, the patient's acute audiogram is usually compared with a previous audiogram, the audiogram of the non-affected ear, or a normal audiogram according to an ISO standard. Generally, many more patients are screened than actually fulfill the particular inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria often require a calculation of pure-tone averages, selection of the most affected frequencies, and calculation of hearing loss differences. MATERIALS AND

methodsA software tool was developed to simplify and accelerate this inclusion procedure for investigators to estimate the possible recruitment rate during the planning phase of a clinical trial and during the actual study. This tool is Microsoft Excel-based and easy to modify to meet the particular inclusion criteria of a specific clinical trial. The tool was retrospectively evaluated on 100 patients with acute hearing loss comparing the times for classifying automatically and manually. The study sample comprised 100 patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS AND

conclusionThe age- and sex-related normative audiogram was calculated automatically by the tool and the hearing impairment was graded. The estimated recruitment rate of our sample was quickly calculated. Information about meeting the inclusion criteria was provided instantaneously. A significant reduction of 30% in the time required for classifying (30 s per patient) was observed.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionSoftwareAgedAudiometry, Pure-ToneClinical Trials as TopicDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleGermanyHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleProgramming LanguagesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityEpidemiologic research designHealth care evaluation mechanismsHearing testsSensorineural hearing lossSudden hearing loss

Identifiers

PMID26607155
OpenAlexW2402807905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.