Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26606921›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2015

Mortality differences and inequalities within and between 'protected characteristics' groups, in a Scottish Cohort 1991-2009.

A D Millard, G Raab, J Lewsey, P Eaglesham, P Craig, K Ralston, G McCartney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A D MillardNHS Health Scotland, Meridian Court, 5, Cadogan Street, Glasgow, G2 6QE, UK. Andrewmillard@nhs.net.
G RaabUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL, UK. gillian.raab@ed.ac.uk.
J LewseyUniversity of Glasgow (Institute of Health and Wellbeing), 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK. phileaglesham@nhs.net.
P EagleshamNHS Health Scotland, Meridian Court, 5, Cadogan Street, Glasgow, G2 6QE, UK. Pauline.craig1@nhs.net.
P CraigNHS Health Scotland, Meridian Court, 5, Cadogan Street, Glasgow, G2 6QE, UK. Jim.Lewsey@glasgow.ac.uk.
K RalstonUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL, UK. kevralston@yahoo.com.
G McCartneyNHS Health Scotland, Meridian Court, 5, Cadogan Street, Glasgow, G2 6QE, UK. gmccartney@nhs.net.
Public Health Scotland · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the interaction between socio-economic status and 'protected characteristics' in Scotland. This study aimed to examine whether differences in mortality were moderated by interactions with social class or deprivation. The practical value was to pinpoint population groups for priority action on health inequality reduction and health improvement rather than a sole focus on the most deprived socioeconomic groups.

methodsWe used data from the Scottish Longitudinal Study which captures a 5.3 % sample of Scotland and links the censuses of 1991, 2001 and 2011. Hazard ratios for mortality were estimated for those protected characteristics with sufficient deaths using Cox proportional hazards models and through the calculation of European age-standardised mortality rates. Inequality was measured by calculating the Relative Index of Inequality (RII).

resultsThe Asian population had a polarised distribution across deprivation deciles and was more likely to be in social class I and II. Those reporting disablement were more likely to live in deprived areas, as were those raised Roman Catholic, whilst those raised as Church of Scotland or as 'other Christian' were less likely to. Those aged 35-54 years were the least likely to live in deprived areas and were most likely to be in social class I and II. Males had higher mortality than females, and disabled people had higher mortality than non-disabled people, across all deprivation deciles and social classes. Asian males and females had generally lower mortality hazards than majority ethnic ('White') males and females although the estimates for Asian males and females were imprecise in some social classes and deprivation deciles. Males and females who reported their raised religion as Roman Catholic or reported 'No religion' had generally higher mortality than other groups, although the estimates for 'Other religion' and 'Other Christian' were less precise.Using both the area deprivation and social class distributions for the whole population, relative mortality inequalities were usually greater amongst those who did not report being disabled, Asians and females aged 35-44 years, males by age, and people aged <75 years. The RIIs for the raised religious groups were generally similar or too imprecise to comment on differences.

conclusionsMortality in Scotland is higher in the majority population, disabled people, males, those reporting being raised as Roman Catholics or with 'no religion' and lower in Asians, females and other religious groups. Relative inequalities in mortality were lower in disabled than nondisabled people, the majority population, females, and greatest in young adults. From the perspective of intersectionality theory, our results clearly demonstrate the importance of representing multiple identities in research on health inequalities.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesMortalityCohort StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleReligionScotlandSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID26606921
PMCPMC4658811
OpenAlexW2177528877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.