Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26606751›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Role of Structural Dynamics at the Receptor G Protein Interface for Signal Transduction.

Alexander S Rose, Ulrich Zachariae, Helmut Grubmüller, Klaus Peter Hofmann, Patrick Scheerer, Peter W Hildebrand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Designing Safer Analgesics via μ-Opioid Receptor Pathways.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander S RoseInstitute of Medical Physics and Biophysics (CC2), Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10098, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich ZachariaeDep. of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Helmut GrubmüllerDep. of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Klaus Peter HofmannInstitute of Medical Physics and Biophysics (CC2), Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10098, Berlin, Germany.
Patrick ScheererInstitute of Medical Physics and Biophysics (CC2), Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10098, Berlin, Germany.
Peter W HildebrandInstitute of Medical Physics and Biophysics (CC2), Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10098, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GPCRs catalyze GDP/GTP exchange in the α-subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins (Gαßγ) through displacement of the Gα C-terminal α5 helix, which directly connects the interface of the active receptor (R*) to the nucleotide binding pocket of G. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry and kinetic analysis of R* catalysed G protein activation have suggested that displacement of α5 starts from an intermediate GDP bound complex (R*•GGDP). To elucidate the structural basis of receptor-catalysed displacement of α5, we modelled the structure of R*•GGDP. A flexible docking protocol yielded an intermediate R*•GGDP complex, with a similar overall arrangement as in the X-ray structure of the nucleotide free complex (R*•Gempty), however with the α5 C-terminus (GαCT) forming different polar contacts with R*. Starting molecular dynamics simulations of GαCT bound to R* in the intermediate position, we observe a screw-like motion, which restores the specific interactions of α5 with R* in R*•Gempty. The observed rotation of α5 by 60° is in line with experimental data. Reformation of hydrogen bonds, water expulsion and formation of hydrophobic interactions are driving forces of the α5 displacement. We conclude that the identified interactions between R* and G protein define a structural framework in which the α5 displacement promotes direct transmission of the signal from R* to the GDP binding pocket.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein ConformationGuanosine DiphosphateHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionGuanosine DiphosphateHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID26606751
PMCPMC4659624
OpenAlexW2174040158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.