Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26606401›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Immuno-Northern Blotting: Detection of RNA Modifications by Using Antibodies against Modified Nucleosides.

Eikan Mishima, Daisuke Jinno, Yasutoshi Akiyama, Kunihiko Itoh, Shinnosuke Nankumo, Hisato Shima, Koichi Kikuchi, Yoichi Takeuchi, Alaa Elkordy, Takehiro Suzuki and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The role of NTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Detection, molecular function and mechanisms of m5C in cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. RNA modifications and their role in gene expression.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. RNA methylation in plants: An overview.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  11. Analysis of NBio-protocol · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The role of mMolecular cancer · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eikan MishimaDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Daisuke JinnoLaboratory of Oncology, Pharmacy Practice and Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sendai, Japan.
Yasutoshi AkiyamaDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kunihiko ItohDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Genetics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shinnosuke NankumoLaboratory of Oncology, Pharmacy Practice and Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sendai, Japan.
Hisato ShimaDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Koichi KikuchiDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoichi TakeuchiDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Alaa ElkordyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Takehiro SuzukiDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kuniyasu NiizumaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Sadayoshi ItoDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshihisa TomiokaLaboratory of Oncology, Pharmacy Practice and Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sendai, Japan.
Takaaki AbeDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology, and Vascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPTohoku Medical Megabank Organization · JPUniversity of Shizuoka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological roles of RNA modifications are still largely not understood. Thus, developing a method for detecting RNA modifications is important for further clarification. We developed a method for detecting RNA modifications called immuno-northern blotting (INB) analysis and herein introduce its various capabilities. This method involves the separation of RNAs using either polyacrylamide or agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by transfer onto a nylon membrane and subsequent immunoblotting using antibodies against modified nucleosides for the detection of specific modifications. We confirmed that INB with the antibodies for 1-methyladenosine (m1A), N6-methyladenosine (m6A), pseudouridine, and 5-methylcytidine (m5C) showed different modifications in a variety of RNAs from various species and organelles. INB with the anti-m5C antibody revealed that the antibody cross-reacted with another modification on DNA, suggesting the application of this method for characterization of the antibody for modified nucleosides. Additionally, using INB with the antibody for m1A, which is a highly specific modification in eukaryotic tRNA, we detected tRNA-derived fragments known as tiRNAs under the cellular stress response, suggesting the application for tracking target RNA containing specific modifications. INB with the anti-m6A antibody confirmed the demethylation of m6A by the specific demethylases fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and ALKBH5, suggesting its application for quantifying target modifications in separated RNAs. Furthermore, INB demonstrated that the knockdown of FTO and ALKBH5 increased the m6A modification in small RNAs as well as in mRNA. The INB method has high specificity, sensitivity, and quantitative capability, and it can be employed with conventional experimental apparatus. Therefore, this method would be useful for research on RNA modifications and metabolism.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalNucleosidesRNABlotting, NorthernSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, MonoclonalNucleosidesRNA

Identifiers

PMID26606401
PMCPMC4659547
OpenAlexW2174876980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.