Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26606051›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

In Depth Characterization of Repetitive DNA in 23 Plant Genomes Reveals Sources of Genome Size Variation in the Legume Tribe Fabeae.

Jiří Macas, Petr Novák, Jaume Pellicer, Jana Čížková, Andrea Koblížková, Pavel Neumann, Iva Fuková, Jaroslav Doležel, Laura J Kelly, Ilia J Leitch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ancient wheat DNA: How and what for?Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Nuclear genome profiling of two species ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The repeatome landscape in the "Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of Genomes of Species fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparative Analysis of Chromosome Repeat DNA Patterns in FourInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. From minor loci to major players? Satellite DNA diversification in Crepis sensu stricto.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiří MacasBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Petr NovákBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Jaume PellicerJodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Jana ČížkováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Andrea KoblížkováBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Pavel NeumannBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Iva FukováBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav DoleželInstitute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Laura J KellySchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Ilia J LeitchJodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZInstitute of Plant Molecular Biology · CZRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBCzech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre · CZQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential accumulation and elimination of repetitive DNA are key drivers of genome size variation in flowering plants, yet there have been few studies which have analysed how different types of repeats in related species contribute to genome size evolution within a phylogenetic context. This question is addressed here by conducting large-scale comparative analysis of repeats in 23 species from four genera of the monophyletic legume tribe Fabeae, representing a 7.6-fold variation in genome size. Phylogenetic analysis and genome size reconstruction revealed that this diversity arose from genome size expansions and contractions in different lineages during the evolution of Fabeae. Employing a combination of low-pass genome sequencing with novel bioinformatic approaches resulted in identification and quantification of repeats making up 55-83% of the investigated genomes. In turn, this enabled an analysis of how each major repeat type contributed to the genome size variation encountered. Differential accumulation of repetitive DNA was found to account for 85% of the genome size differences between the species, and most (57%) of this variation was found to be driven by a single lineage of Ty3/gypsy LTR-retrotransposons, the Ogre elements. Although the amounts of several other lineages of LTR-retrotransposons and the total amount of satellite DNA were also positively correlated with genome size, their contributions to genome size variation were much smaller (up to 6%). Repeat analysis within a phylogenetic framework also revealed profound differences in the extent of sequence conservation between different repeat types across Fabeae. In addition to these findings, the study has provided a proof of concept for the approach combining recent developments in sequencing and bioinformatics to perform comparative analyses of repetitive DNAs in a large number of non-model species without the need to assemble their genomes.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, PlantGenome SizeGenomicsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidEvolution, MolecularFabaceaePhylogenyReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNATerminal Repeat Sequences

Identifiers

PMID26606051
PMCPMC4659654
OpenAlexW2174324988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.