ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2015
Predictive modeling of structured electronic health records for adverse drug event detection.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning methods for predicting adverse drug events: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of AI-based models in pharmacoepidemiology for adverse drug event prediction and detection.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning to predict adverse drug events based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Electronic health record-based prediction models for in-hospital adverse drug event diagnosis or prognosis: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Pooled it
- The use of Electronic Health Records to Support Population Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of medical systems · 2018Pooled it
- Evaluating the Performance of Traditional Pharmacoepidemiologic and Machine Learning Models to Predict Pregnancies at Risk of Major Congenital Malformations.Birth defects research · 2026Article
- Prediction of antibiotic-associated cutaneous adverse drug reactions using electronic health record foundation models.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning risk prediction models for medication harm in hospitalised adult patients.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- Analytical approaches for medication management for patient safety: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2025Article
- How machine learning on real world clinical data improves adverse event recording for endoscopy.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Risks and Benefits of Pharmacological Treatment for Pediatric Chronic Non-cancer Pain: When Safety Evidence Lags Behind Prescription Pads.Paediatric drugs · 2025Review
- Leveraging undecided cases in chart-reviewed phenotypes to enhance EHR-based association studies.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to Predict Poor Control of Chronic Respiratory Diseases in Primary Care: A Novel Approach to Focus Our Efforts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Drug-Related Side Effects: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- An innovative method to strengthen evidence for potential drug safety signals using Electronic Health Records.Journal of medical systems · 2024Article
- Risk Management and Patient Safety in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Using machine learning to develop a clinical prediction model for SSRI-associated bleeding: a feasibility study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Predicting disease onset from electronic health records for population health management: a scalable and explainable Deep Learning approach.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- Survival Analysis of Oncological Patients Using Machine Learning Method.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning in Causal Inference: Application in Pharmacovigilance.Drug safety · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe digitization of healthcare data, resulting from the increasingly widespread adoption of electronic health records, has greatly facilitated its analysis by computational methods and thereby enabled large-scale secondary use thereof. This can be exploited to support public health activities such as pharmacovigilance, wherein the safety of drugs is monitored to inform regulatory decisions about sustained use. To that end, electronic health records have emerged as a potentially valuable data source, providing access to longitudinal observations of patient treatment and drug use. A nascent line of research concerns predictive modeling of healthcare data for the automatic detection of adverse drug events, which presents its own set of challenges: it is not yet clear how to represent the heterogeneous data types in a manner conducive to learning high-performing machine learning models.
methodsDatasets from an electronic health record database are used for learning predictive models with the purpose of detecting adverse drug events. The use and representation of two data types, as well as their combination, are studied: clinical codes, describing prescribed drugs and assigned diagnoses, and measurements. Feature selection is conducted on the various types of data to reduce dimensionality and sparsity, while allowing for an in-depth feature analysis of the usefulness of each data type and representation.
resultsWithin each data type, combining multiple representations yields better predictive performance compared to using any single representation. The use of clinical codes for adverse drug event detection significantly outperforms the use of measurements; however, there is no significant difference over datasets between using only clinical codes and their combination with measurements. For certain adverse drug events, the combination does, however, outperform using only clinical codes. Feature selection leads to increased predictive performance for both data types, in isolation and combined.
conclusionsWe have demonstrated how machine learning can be applied to electronic health records for the purpose of detecting adverse drug events and proposed solutions to some of the challenges this presents, including how to represent the various data types. Overall, clinical codes are more useful than measurements and, in specific cases, it is beneficial to combine the two.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.