Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26605800›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Task-Shifting and Quality of HIV Testing Services: Experiences from a National Reference Hospital in Zambia.

Sheila Mwangala, Karen M Moland, Hope C Nkamba, Kunda G Musonda, Mwaka Monze, Katoba K Musukwa, Knut Fylkesnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sheila MwangalaVirology Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Karen M MolandCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Hope C NkambaVirology Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Kunda G MusondaVirology Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mwaka MonzeVirology Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Katoba K MusukwaVirology Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Knut FylkesnesCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith new testing technologies, task-shifting and rapid scale-up of HIV testing services in high HIV prevalence countries, assuring quality of HIV testing is paramount. This study aimed to explore various cadres of providers' experiences in providing HIV testing services and their understanding of elements that impact on quality of service in Zambia.

methodsSixteen in-depth interviews and two focus group discussions were conducted with HIV testing service providers including lay counselors, nurses and laboratory personnel at purposively selected HIV testing sites at a national reference hospital in Lusaka. Qualitative content analysis was adopted for data analysis.

resultsLay counselors and nurses reported confidentiality and privacy to be greatly compromised due to limited space in both in- and out-patient settings. Difficulties in upholding consent were reported in provider-initiated testing in in-patient settings. The providers identified non-adherence to testing procedures, high workload and inadequate training and supervision as key elements impacting on quality of testing. Difficulties related to testing varied by sub-groups of providers: lay counselors, in finger pricking and obtaining adequate volumes of specimen; non-laboratory providers in general, in interpreting invalid, false-negative and false-positive results. The providers had been participating in a recently established national HIV quality assurance program, i.e. proficiency testing, but rarely received site supervisory visits.

conclusionTask-shifting coupled with policy shifts in service provision has seriously challenged HIV testing quality, protection of confidentiality and the process of informed consent. Ways to better protect confidentiality and informed consent need careful attention. Training, supervision and quality assurance need strengthening tailored to the needs of the different cadres of providers.

Indexed as

Health ServicesQuality of Health CareAdultClinical CompetenceConfidentialityFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansInformed ConsentMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedQuality Assurance, Health CareReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID26605800
PMCPMC4659558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.