ArticlePloS one2015
Cannabis Liberalization and Adolescent Cannabis Use: A Cross-National Study in 38 Countries.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Tobacco and cannabis use in the young 'Not in Employment, Education or Training' population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Suicidality risk after using cannabis and cannabinoids: An umbrella review.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Does liberalisation of cannabis policy influence levels of use in adolescents and young adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Evidence for Sex Convergence in Prevalence of Cannabis Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2017Pooled it
- Clinician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to the treatment of adolescent cannabis use: A qualitative study.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2025Article
- Cannabis Use from Early Adolescence to the Mid-Twenties in Children of Immigrant and Nonimmigrant Parents: Findings from a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2025Article
- How we understand fully the supply, demand, and harm reduction in drugs policy in Vietnam?Harm reduction journal · 2024Review
- Prevalence of Cannabis Use around the World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2000-2024.China CDC weekly · 2024Article
- Health, safety, and socioeconomic impacts of cannabis liberalization laws: An evidence and gap map.Campbell systematic reviews · 2023Article
- The ethics and management of cannabis use in pregnancy following decriminalisation and licensing for medical use: narrative review.BJPsych bulletin · 2023Review
- Consumer perceptions of legal cannabis products in Canada, 2019-2021: a repeat cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Ghana's preparedness to exploit the medicinal value of industrial hemp.Journal of cannabis research · 2022Article
- Understanding Vietnam's drug policy for amphetamine-type stimulants misuse.Harm reduction journal · 2022Article
- Trends in cannabis-related attitudes and behaviors among cannabis-using adolescent and young adult outpatients following medical cannabis legalization in Massachusetts.Substance abuse · 2022Article
- The impact of cannabis legalization for recreational purposes on youth: A narrative review of the Canadian experience.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
- Changes in alcohol use by cannabis use status among adolescents and young adults in the United States: Emerging evidence for both substitution and complementarity.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2021Article
- Adolescent exposure to cannabis marketing following recreational cannabis legalization in Canada: A pilot study using ecological momentary assessment.Addictive behaviors reports · 2021Article
- Youth Cannabis use and Legalization in Canada - Reconsidering the Fears, Myths and Facts Three Years In.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2021Article
- Cigarette Use and Cannabis Use Disorder Onset, Persistence, and Relapse: Longitudinal Data From a Representative Sample of US Adults.The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2021Article
- Trends in youth cannabis use across cannabis legalization: Data from the COMPASS prospective cohort study.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess the associations between types of cannabis control policies at country level and prevalence of adolescent cannabis use. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND
designMultilevel logistic regressions were performed on 172,894 adolescents 15 year of age who participated in the 2001/2002, 2005/2006, or 2009/2010 cross-sectional Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) survey in 38 European and North American countries. MEASURES: Self-reported cannabis use status was classified into ever use in life time, use in past year, and regular use. Country-level cannabis control policies were categorized into a dichotomous measure (whether or not liberalized) as well as 4 detailed types (full prohibition, depenalization, decriminalization, and partial prohibition). Control variables included individual-level sociodemographic characteristics and country-level economic characteristics.
findingsConsiderable intra-class correlations (.15-.19) were found at country level. With respect to the dichotomized cannabis control policy, adolescents were more likely to ever use cannabis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.10, p = .001), use in past year (OR = 1.09, p = .007), and use regularly (OR = 1.26, p = .004). Although boys were substantially more likely to use cannabis, the correlation between cannabis liberalization and cannabis use was smaller in boys than in girls. With respect to detailed types of policies, depenalization was associated with higher odds of past-year use (OR = 1.14, p = .013) and regular use (OR = 1.23, p = .038), and partial prohibition was associated with higher odds of regular use (OR = 2.39, p = .016). The correlation between cannabis liberalization and regular use was only significant after the policy had been introduced for more than 5 years.
conclusionsCannabis liberalization with depenalization and partial prohibition policies was associated with higher levels of regular cannabis use among adolescents. The correlations were heterogeneous between genders and between short- and long-terms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.