Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26605216›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2015

Evaluation of estrogen receptor expression and its relationship with clinicopathologic findings in gastric cancer.

Hamid Saeidi, Mohammad Reza Ghavam Nasiri, Soodabeh Shahidsales, Ali Taghizadeh Kermani, Simin Hematti, Seyedeh Setareh Roodbari, Mohammad Hossein Mottaghi Shahri, Sepideh Chagharvand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Image Quality and Interpretation of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hamid SaeidiCancer Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Science (GUMS), Guilan, Iran.
Mohammad Reza Ghavam NasiriCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Isfahan, Iran.
Soodabeh ShahidsalesCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Isfahan, Iran.
Ali Taghizadeh KermaniCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Isfahan, Iran.
Simin HemattiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Isfahan, Iran.
Seyedeh Setareh RoodbariCancer Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Science (GUMS), Guilan, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein Mottaghi ShahriGeneral Physicians, Cancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS), Mashhad, Iran.
Sepideh ChagharvandCancer Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Science (GUMS), Guilan, Iran.
University of Guilan · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of estrogen receptor alpha has been reported in the cell and tissue levels in gastric cancer; however, its impact on patients' survival remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of estrogen receptor in gastric carcinoma as well as its relationship with the clinicopathologic findings of the patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was performed on 100 endoscopic biopsies of gastric adenocarcinoma for estrogen receptor expression using an immunohistochemical method, and their relationship with the clinicopathologic findings of the patients, such as age, gender, tumor site, size, grade, depth of tumor invasion (T), and lymphatic status (N), were analyzed using independent sample t-test and Pearson Chi-square test. A P < 0.05 was considered significant in all analyses.

resultsUsing an immunohistochemical method on endoscopic biopsies of 74 males and 26 females with the mean age of 63 years, estrogen receptor was found to be positive in 41% of patients. No significant difference was found between estrogen receptor expression and other clinicopathologic findings (P = 0.75). There was a significant difference between estrogen receptor (+) and estrogen receptor (-) groups in nodal involvement (P = 0.001). The estrogen receptor (+) patients had more number of lymph nodes involved.

conclusionThis study showed that lymph node involvement has a significant relationship with estrogen receptor expression. However, no significant relationship was found between estrogen receptor expression and other clinicopathologic findings such as age, gender, tumor site in stomach, tumor size, tumor grade, and T-stage.

Indexed as

Clinicopathologic findingsestrogen receptorgastric cancerimmunohistochemical technique

Identifiers

PMID26605216
PMCPMC4617152
OpenAlexW2258318975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.