Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26605194›Full record

ArticleMuscles, ligaments and tendons journal

High volume image guided injections and structured rehabilitation in shoulder impingement syndrome: a retrospective study.

Sarah Morton, Otto Chan, Asser Ghozlan, Jessica Price, John Perry, Dylan Morrissey

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03303001 (Subacromial Injection of High Volume Versus Conventional Steroid Injection Guided by Ultrasound in Shoulder Pain. Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03303001 nacompletednot on this map

Subacromial Injection of High Volume Versus Conventional Steroid Injection Guided by Ultrasound in Shoulder Pain. Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonRan2017 to 2020Enrolled22ConditionsSubacromial Bursitis, Subacromial Impingement Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Impingement SyndromeArmsSubacromial high volume infiltration, Subacromial conventional infiltration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah MortonCentre for Sports and Exercise Medicine William Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London Mile End Hospital, London, UK.
Otto ChanBMI London Independent Hospital, London, UK.
Asser GhozlanCentre for Sports and Exercise Medicine William Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London Mile End Hospital, London, UK.
Jessica PriceCentre for Sports and Exercise Medicine William Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London Mile End Hospital, London, UK.
John PerryCentre for Sports and Exercise Medicine William Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London Mile End Hospital, London, UK ; BMI London Independent Hospital, London, UK.
Dylan MorrisseyCentre for Sports and Exercise Medicine William Harvey Research Institute Queen Mary University of London Mile End Hospital, London, UK ; BMI London Independent Hospital, London, UK ; Physiotherapy Department, Bart's Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
William Harvey Research Institute · GB

Funding

Department of Health CAT SCL-2013-04-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundthe aim was to establish the effect of a high volume-image guided injection and structured rehabilitation (HVIGI&SR) on both pain and function in shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS).

methods44 participants treated between January 2008 and January 2012 with a >3 month history of recalcitrant ultrasound-confirmed SIS were sent a retrospective questionnaire. All participants had received a HVIGI under ultrasound-guidance consisting of 20 mls of Marcaine with 50 mg of hydrocortisone, followed by a period of physiotherapist-led rehabilitation. The validated Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score was used to establish the change in the score between 1 week pre-injection and 3 weeks post-injection, along with an 11-point pain scale.

results59% of participants responded. There was a clinically and statistically significant decrease in the SPADI score of 58.7 ± 29.9 (p<0.01). 76% of participants had an improvement in their score of over 50% from their initial score. There was a clinically and statistically significant improvement in pain of 5.19 ± 2.62 (p<0.01) on the numerical rating scale of pain.

conclusionHVIGI&SR should be considered for short-term treatment of SIS as it showed a significant improvement in both pain and function. A prolonged period of physiotherapist-led rehabilitation can then be undertaken for long term benefits.

Indexed as

injectionrotator cuffSPADIultrasound

Identifiers

PMID26605194
PMCPMC4617220
OpenAlexW2468270363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.