ReviewZoological letters2015
Toward elucidating diversity of neural mechanisms underlying insect learning.
Review in Zoological letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular mechanisms of the hypothalamus miR-27a/Zoological research · 2026Article
- Octopamine in the mushroom body circuitry for learning and memory.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Dual roles of dopaminergic pathways in olfactory learning and memory in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis.Pesticide biochemistry and physiology · 2024Article
- Monoamines, Insulin and the Roles They Play in Associative Learning in Pond Snails.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Review
- Pharmacologic inhibition of phospholipase C in the brain attenuates early memory formation in the honeybee (Biology open · 2018Article
- Application of a Prediction Error Theory to Pavlovian Conditioning in an Insect.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Relationship between the grades of a learned aversive-feeding response and the dopamine contents in Lymnaea.Biology open · 2016Article
- Roles of OA1 octopamine receptor and Dop1 dopamine receptor in mediating appetitive and aversive reinforcement revealed by RNAi studies.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Reward from bugs to bipeds: a comparative approach to understanding how reward circuits function.Journal of neurogenetics · 2016Review
- Dopamine- and Tyrosine Hydroxylase-Immunoreactive Neurons in the Brain of the American Cockroach, Periplaneta americana.PloS one · 2016Article
- Knockout crickets for the study of learning and memory: Dopamine receptor Dop1 mediates aversive but not appetitive reinforcement in crickets.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Roles of octopamine and dopamine in appetitive and aversive memory acquisition studied in olfactory conditioning of maxillary palpi extension response in crickets.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2015Article
- Entomological journals and publishing in Japan.Applied entomology and zoologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insects are widely used as models to study neural mechanisms of learning and memory. Our recent studies on crickets, together with reports on other insect species, suggest that some fundamental differences exist in neural and molecular mechanisms of learning and memory among different species of insects, particularly between crickets and fruit flies. First, we suggested that in crickets octopamine (OA) and dopamine (DA) neurons convey reward and punishment signals, respectively, in associated learning. On the other hand, it has been reported that in fruit flies different sets of DA neurons convey reward or punishment signals. Secondly, we have suggested that in crickets OA and DA neurons participate in the retrieval of appetitive and aversive memories, respectively, while this is not the case in fruit flies. Thirdly, cyclic AMP signaling is critical for short-term memory formation in fruit flies, but not in crickets. Finally, nitric oxide-cyclic GMP signaling and calcium-calmodulin signaling are critical for long-term memory (LTM) formation in crickets, but such roles have not been reported in fruit flies. Not all of these differences can be ascribed to different experimental methods used in studies. We thus suggest that there are unexpected diversities in basic mechanisms of learning and memory among different insect species, especially between crickets and fruit flies. Studies on a larger number of insect species will help clarify the diversity of learning and memory mechanisms in relation to functional adaptation to the environment and evolutionary history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.