Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26604998›Full record

ArticleGMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung2015

Desire and reality--teaching and assessing communicative competencies in undergraduate medical education in German-speaking Europe--a survey.

Anja Härtl, Cadja Bachmann, Katharina Blum, Stefan Höfer, Tim Peters, Ingrid Preusche, Bianca Raski, Stefan Rüttermann, Michaela Wagner-Menghin, Alexander Wünsch and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The effect of video-assisted oral feedback versus oral feedback on surgical communicative competences in undergraduate training.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. WIPAKOGMS journal for medical education · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anja HärtlKlinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Deutschland.
Cadja BachmannUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Katharina BlumKlinikum der Universität München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, München, Deutschland.
Stefan HöferMedizin Universität Innsbruck, Universitätsklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Innsbruck, Österreich.
Tim PetersRuhr-Universität Bochum, Medizinische Fakultät, Zentrum für Medizinische Lehre, Bochum, Deutschland.
Ingrid PreuscheMedizinische Universität Wien, Department für Medizinische Aus- und Weiterbildung, Wien, Österreich.
Bianca RaskiUniversitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Studiendekanat, Düsseldorf, Deutschland ; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinisches Institut für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Stefan RüttermannGoethe-Universität Frankfurt, ZZMK Carolinum, Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung, Frankfurt, Deutschland.
Michaela Wagner-MenghinMedizinische Universität Wien, Department für Medizinische Aus- und Weiterbildung, Wien, Österreich.
Alexander WünschKlinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, München, Deutschland ; Technische Universität München, TUM MeDiCAL, München, Deutschland.
Claudia KiesslingMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Bereich Assessment und Prüfungsorganisation, Neuruppin, Deutschland.
GMA-Ausschuss Kommunikative und Soziale Kompetenzen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIncreasingly, communicative competencies are becoming a permanent feature of training and assessment in German-speaking medical schools (n=43; Germany, Austria, Switzerland - "D-A-CH"). In support of further curricular development of communicative competencies, the survey by the "Communicative and Social Competencies" (KusK) committee of the German Society for Medical Education (GMA) systematically appraises the scope of and form in which teaching and assessment take place.

methodsThe iterative online questionnaire, developed in cooperation with KusK, comprises 70 questions regarding instruction (n=14), assessment (n=48), local conditions (n=5), with three fields for further remarks. Per location, two to three individuals who were familiar with the respective institute's curriculum were invited to take part in the survey.

resultsThirty-nine medical schools (40 degree programmes) took part in the survey. Communicative competencies are taught in all of the programmes. Ten degree programmes have a longitudinal curriculum for communicative competencies; 25 programmes offer this in part. Sixteen of the 40 programmes use the Basler Consensus Statement for orientation. In over 80% of the degree programmes, communicative competencies are taught in the second and third year of studies. Almost all of the programmes work with simulated patients (n=38) and feedback (n=37). Exams are exclusively summative (n=11), exclusively formative (n=3), or both summative and formative (n=16) and usually take place in the fifth or sixth year of studies (n=22 and n=20). Apart from written examinations (n=15) and presentations (n=9), practical examinations are primarily administered (OSCE, n=31); WPA (n=8), usually with self-developed scales (OSCE, n=19). With regards to the examiners' training and the manner of results-reporting to the students, there is a high variance.

conclusionsInstruction in communicative competencies has been implemented at all 39 of the participating medical schools. For the most part, communicative competencies instruction in the D-A-C-H region takes place in small groups and is tested using the OSCE. The challenges for further curricular development lie in the expansion of feedback, the critical evaluation of appropriate assessment strategies, and in the quality assurance of exams.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationEducation, Medical, UndergraduateReality TestingTeachingAustriaCurriculumEducationEducational MeasurementGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesPatient SimulationSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandassessmentcommunicative competenciesinstructionlongitudinal curriculummedical studies

Identifiers

PMID26604998
PMCPMC4647163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.