Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26604940›Full record

ReviewClinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases

New perspectives in echographic diagnosis of osteoporosis on hip and spine.

Sergio Casciaro, Francesco Conversano, Paola Pisani, Maurizio Muratore

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bone Biomarkers Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergio CasciaroNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy.
Francesco ConversanoNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy.
Paola PisaniNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy.
Maurizio MuratoreOU of Rheumatology, "Galateo" Hospital, San Cesario di Lecce, ASL-LE, Lecce, Italy.
National Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the accepted "gold standard" method for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and osteoporosis diagnosis is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, actual DXA effectiveness is limited by several factors, including intrinsic accuracy uncertainties and possible errors in patient positioning and/or post-acquisition data analysis. DXA employment is also restricted by the typical issues related to ionizing radiation employment (high costs, need of dedicated structures and certified operators, unsuitability for population screenings). The only commercially-available alternative to DXA is represented by "quantitative ultrasound" (QUS) approaches, which are radiation-free, cheaper and portable, but they cannot be applied on the reference anatomical sites (lumbar spine and proximal femur). Therefore, their documented clinical usefulness is restricted to calcaneal applications on elderly patients (aged over 65 y), in combination with clinical risk factors and only for the identification of healthy subjects at low fracture risk. Literature-reported studies performed some QUS measurements on proximal femur, but their clinical translation is mostly hindered by intrinsic factors (e.g., device bulkiness). An innovative ultrasound methodology has been recently introduced, which performs a combined analysis of B-mode images and corresponding "raw" radiofrequency signals acquired during an echographic scan of the target reference anatomical site, providing two novel parameters: Osteoporosis Score and Fragility Score, indicative of BMD level and bone strength, respectively. This article will provide a brief review of the available systems for osteoporosis diagnosis in clinical routine contexts, followed by a synthesis of the most promising research results on the latest ultrasound developments for early osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture prevention.

Indexed as

bone mineral densitybone qualityDXAosteoporosis diagnosisultrasound

Identifiers

PMID26604940
PMCPMC4625771
OpenAlexW2182524225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.