ArticleClinical interventions in aging2015
Consumer views about aging-in-place.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Middle aged and older adult's perspectives of their own home environment: a review of qualitative studies and meta-synthesis.BMC geriatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Co-Designing Technology for Aging in Place: A Systematic Review.The Gerontologist · 2021Pooled it
- Proxy indicators to support independent ageing-in-place in older people with frailty: a Delphi-style expert consultation survey.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Quality of end-of-life care among individuals with and without dementia: a Swedish registry-based study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Non-medical barriers and facilitators of ageing in place: a cohort study in the Netherlands.European journal of ageing · 2025Article
- Older adult supportive environment at home-a case study in Jordan: overall sense of control associated with home modification.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- The Impact of Living Arrangements and Social Capital on the Well-Being of the Elderly.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Aging in Place or Institutionalization? A Multiscale Analysis of Independent-Living Older Adults From Four Large Cities in China's Yangtze River Delta.Innovation in aging · 2023Article
- Article
- Transitioning to long-term care for older adults with intellectual disabilities: A concept analysis.Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID · 2022Review
- Concept development of "Aging in place": Application of hybrid model.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Review
- Needs, benefits, and issues related to home adaptation: a user-centered case series applying a mixed-methods design.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Aging-related Resiliency Theory Development.Belitung nursing journal · 2022Article
- Attitude towards ageing and perceived health status of community-dwelling older persons in a low resource setting: a rural-urban comparison.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Article
- Healthy Ageing in Place: Enablers and Barriers from the Perspective of the Elderly. A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Understanding changes and stability in the long-term use of technologies by seniors who are aging in place: a dynamical framework.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- Independence and Caregiver Preferences Among Community-Dwelling Older People in Slovenia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupporting older people's choices to live safely and independently in the community (age-in-place) can maximize their quality of life and minimize unnecessary hospitalizations and residential care placement. Little is known of the views of older people about the aging-in-place process, and how they approach and prioritize the support they require to live in the community accommodation of their choice. PURPOSE: To explore and synthesize the experiences and perspectives of older people planning for and experiencing aging-in-place.
methodsTwo purposively sampled groups of community-dwelling people aged 65+ years were recruited for individual interviews or focus groups. The interviews were semistructured, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Themes were identified by three researchers working independently, then in consort, using a qualitative thematic analysis approach.
resultsForty-two participants provided a range of insights about, and strategies for, aging-in-place. Thematic saturation was reached before the final interviews. We identified personal characteristics (resilience, adaptability, and independence) and key elements of successful aging-in-place, summarized in the acronym HIPFACTS: health, information, practical assistance, finance, activity (physical and mental), company (family, friends, neighbors, pets), transport, and safety. DISCUSSION: This paper presents rich, and rarely heard, older people's views about how they and their peers perceive, characterize, and address changes in their capacity to live independently and safely in the community. Participants identified relatively simple, low-cost, and effective supports to enable them to adapt to change, while retaining independence and resilience. The findings highlighted how successful aging-in-place requires integrated, responsive, and accessible primary health and community services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.