ArticleMolecular vision2015
Molecular analysis of the CHST6 gene in Korean patients with macular corneal dystrophy: Identification of three novel mutations.
Article in Molecular vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel compound heterozygous mutations in theAnnals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Genetic Variation Spectrum Related to Corneal Dystrophy in a Large Cohort.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- CHST6 mutations identified in Iranian MCD patients and CHST6 mutations reported worldwide identify targets for gene editing approaches including the CRISPR/Cas system.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- A comprehensive evaluation of 181 reportedAging · 2019Article
- Article
- Genetic analysis ofMolecular vision · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify the underlying genetic defect in Korean patients with macular corneal dystrophy (MCD).
methodsGenomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes of seven patients from six unrelated families with MCD (three men and four women). Polymerase chain reaction was performed for coding regions of the carbohydrate sulfotransferase (CHST6), gene followed by bidirectional sequencing. Targeted mutational analysis (exons 4, 11-12, 14) of the transforming growth factor, beta-induced (TGFBI) gene was performed for all patients.
resultsAll seven patients were found to have compound heterozygous mutations in the CHST6 gene. In addition to six previously reported mutations, c.95C>A (p.Ser32*), c.521A>G (p.Lys174Arg), c.557C>G (p.Pro186Arg), c.613C>T (p.Arg205Trp), c.820G>A (p.Glu274Lys), and c.1072T>C (p.Tyr358His), three novel mutations were identified in this study, including two missense mutations, c.353C>T (p.Ser118Phe) and c.922C>T (p.His308Tyr), and one frameshift mutation, c.786delC (p.L264Cfs*117). Among the three novel mutations, only the c.353C>T mutation had been reported in the Exon Aggregation Consortium database at an extremely low frequency of 0.00005072. In addition, these three novel mutations were absent from controls in 1,000 genomes, dbSNP, and the TIARA genome database, which is a Korean personal genome database. The most frequent mutation was c.613C>T (p.Arg205Trp), revealed in four unrelated Korean families, which has not previously been reported in other populations. No mutations were detected in the TGFBI gene. DISCUSSION: This is the first report on genetic analysis of Korean MCD patients. Three novel and six previously reported disease-causing CHST6 mutations were identified, which expands the mutational spectrum of MCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26604660PMC4626780W1874581922What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.