Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26604622›Full record

ArticleJournal of natural science, biology, and medicine2015

Predebridement wound culture in open fractures does not predict postoperative wound infection: A pilot study.

Reddy Lingaraj, John Ashutosh Santoshi, Sheela Devi, Syed Najimudeen, James J Gnanadoss, Rengasamy Kanagasabai, Reba Kanungo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Open fractures].Der Unfallchirurg · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Primary soft tissue management in open fracture].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reddy LingarajDepartment of Orthopaedics, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.
John Ashutosh SantoshiDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sheela DeviDepartment of Microbiology, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.
Syed NajimudeenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.
James J GnanadossDepartment of Orthopaedics, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.
Rengasamy KanagasabaiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.
Reba KanungoDepartment of Microbiology, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.
Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is confusion in the current literature regarding the value of obtaining predebridement wound cultures in the management of open fractures with several studies reporting contrasting results. We undertook a pilot study to determine the initial bacterial flora of open fractures in our environment and determine the correlation between subsequent wound infection if any, and the initial bacterial flora. MATERIALS AND

methodsInitial/predebridement wound swabs were obtained for 32 patients with open fractures. Patients underwent a debridement of the open wound and preliminary stabilization of fracture in the operating room within 24 h. Postdebridement wound cultures were obtained at 48 h and repeated subsequently, if indicated, during the follow-up period. The antibiotic therapy was modified based on the culture reports.

resultsInitial wound swab culture showed bacterial contamination in 18 patients (56%); 14 patients (44%) developed an infection in the immediate postoperative period or during follow-up. Age, gender, co-morbid medical condition, delay in presentation, and grade of open fracture were not found to be predictors of postoperative infection. No patient had an infection with the same organism, which was present in the initial culture.

conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that the initial flora are not the infecting organisms in the open fracture wounds, and predebridement wound cultures have no value in predicting postdebridement wound infection.

Indexed as

Cultureinfectioninitialopen fracture

Identifiers

PMID26604622
PMCPMC4630766
OpenAlexW2180482705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.