ArticleHuman molecular genetics2016
Whole-exome sequencing of over 4100 men of African ancestry and prostate cancer risk.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Literature Review of Whole Exome and Genome Sequencing Population Studies of Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Comprehensive analysis of the expression and prognostic value of ARMCs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Epidemiologic study on prostate cancer in Sudanese men across African ethnic groups.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association of rare, recurrent nonsynonymous variants in the germline of prostate cancer patients of African ancestry.The Prostate · 2023Article
- Germline mutation landscape of DNA damage repair genes in African Americans with prostate cancer highlights potentially targetable RAD genes.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Hereditable variants of classical protein tyrosine phosphatase genes: Will they prove innocent or guilty?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Inflammatory metabolic profile of South African patients with prostate cancer.Cancer & metabolism · 2021Article
- Exome-Wide Pan-Cancer Analysis of Germline Variants in 8,719 Individuals Finds Little Evidence of Rare Variant Associations.Human heredity · 2021Article
- Review
- Psychosocial Stress, Glucocorticoid Signaling, and Prostate Cancer Health Disparities in African American Men.Cancer health disparities · 2020Article
- Prostate Cancer Genomics: Recent Advances and the Prevailing Underrepresentation from Racial and Ethnic Minorities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- The 22Rv1 prostate cancer cell line carries mixed genetic ancestry: Implications for prostate cancer health disparities research using pre-clinical models.The Prostate · 2017Article
- Targeted sequencing of established and candidate colorectal cancer genes in the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Identification of gene pairs through penalized regression subject to constraints.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Exome Sequencing of African-American Prostate Cancer Reveals Loss-of-FunctionCancer discovery · 2017Article
- Inherited Predisposition to Prostate Cancer: From Gene Discovery to Clinical Impact.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2017Article
- Heritability of prostate cancer: a tale of rare variants and common single nucleotide polymorphisms.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Advances in genetics: widening our understanding of prostate cancer.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Clinical validity and utility of genetic risk scores in prostate cancer.Asian journal of andrologyReview
- Prostate Cancer Genomics Research Disparities in Africa: Advancing Knowledge in Resource Constrained Settings.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in males, with a ∼1.5-2-fold higher incidence in African American men when compared with whites. Epidemiologic evidence supports a large heritable contribution to prostate cancer, with over 100 susceptibility loci identified to date that can explain ∼33% of the familial risk. To explore the contribution of both rare and common variation in coding regions to prostate cancer risk, we sequenced the exomes of 2165 prostate cancer cases and 2034 controls of African ancestry at a mean coverage of 10.1×. We identified 395 220 coding variants down to 0.05% frequency [57% non-synonymous (NS), 42% synonymous and 1% gain or loss of stop codon or splice site variant] in 16 751 genes with the strongest associations observed in SPARCL1 on 4q22.1 (rs13051, Ala49Asp, OR = 0.78, P = 1.8 × 10(-6)) and PTPRR on 12q15 (rs73341069, Val239Ile, OR = 1.62, P = 2.5 × 10(-5)). In gene-level testing, the two most significant genes were C1orf100 (P = 2.2 × 10(-4)) and GORAB (P = 2.3 × 10(-4)). We did not observe exome-wide significant associations (after correcting for multiple hypothesis testing) in single variant or gene-level testing in the overall case-control or case-case analyses of disease aggressiveness. In this first whole-exome sequencing study of prostate cancer, our findings do not provide strong support for the hypothesis that NS coding variants down to 0.5-1.0% frequency have large effects on prostate cancer risk in men of African ancestry. Higher-coverage sequencing efforts in larger samples will be needed to study rarer variants with smaller effect sizes associated with prostate cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.