Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26604001›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the peer-delivered Thinking Healthy Programme for perinatal depression in Pakistan and India: the SHARE study protocol for randomised controlled trials.

Siham Sikander, Anisha Lazarus, Omer Bangash, Daniela C Fuhr, Benedict Weobong, Revathi N Krishna, Ikhlaq Ahmad, Helen A Weiss, LeShawndra Price, Atif Rahman and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02104232 nacompletednot on this map

Thinking Healthy Program - Peer Delivered, India (THPP-I)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2014 to 2017Enrolled280ConditionsUnipolar DepressionArmsTHPP-I, EUC
NCT02111915 nacompletednot on this map

Thinking Healthy Program - Peer Delivered in Pakistan

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LiverpoolRan2014 to 2017Enrolled560ConditionsUnipolar DepressionArmsTHPP-P, EUC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Siham SikanderHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan. siham.sikander@hdrfoundation.org.
Anisha LazarusSangath, , Goa, India. anisha.lazarus@sangath.in.
Omer BangashHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan. omer.bangash@hdrfoundation.org.
Daniela C FuhrFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. daniela.fuhr@lshtm.ac.uk.
Benedict WeobongFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. benedict.weobong@lshtm.ac.uk.
Revathi N KrishnaSangath, , Goa, India. revathi.krishna@sangath.in.
Ikhlaq AhmadHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan. ikhlaq.malik@hdrfoundation.org.
Helen A WeissFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. helen.weiss@lshtm.ac.uk.
LeShawndra PriceDepartment of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. lprice@mail.nih.gov.
Atif RahmanInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. atif.rahman@liverpool.ac.uk.
Vikram PatelSangath, , Goa, India. vikram.patel@lshtm.ac.uk.
Human Development Research Foundation · PKLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSangath · INNational Institutes of Health · USPublic Health Foundation of India · INUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

South Asian Hub for Advocacy, Research & Education on Mental Health (SHARE)U19MH095687 · NIMH · LONDON SCH/HYGIENE & TROPICAL MEDICINE · PI FUHR, DANIELA, RAHMAN, ATIF · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH095687NIMH NIH HHS U19MH95687Wellcome Trust 084674Wellcome Trust 091834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRates of perinatal depression (antenatal and postnatal depression) in South Asia are among the highest in the world. The delivery of effective psychological treatments for perinatal depression through existing health systems is a challenge due to a lack of human resources. This paper reports on a trial protocol that aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Thinking Healthy Programme delivered by peers (Thinking Healthy Programme Peer-delivered; THPP), for women with moderate to severe perinatal depression in rural and urban settings in Pakistan and India. METHODS/

designTHPP is evaluated with two randomised controlled trials: a cluster trial in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and an individually randomised trial in Goa, India. Trial participants are pregnant women who are registered with the lady health workers in the study area in Pakistan and pregnant women attending outpatient antenatal clinics in India. They will be screened using the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression symptoms and will be eligible if their PHQ-9 is equal to or greater than 10 (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). The sample size will be 560 and 280 women in Pakistan and India, respectively. Women in the intervention arm (THPP) will be offered ten individual and four group sessions (Pakistan) or 6-14 individual sessions (India) delivered by a peer (defined as a mother from the same community who is trained and supervised in delivering the intervention). Women in the control arm (enhanced usual care) will receive health care as usual, enhanced by providing the gynaecologist or primary-health facilities with adapted WHO mhGAP guidelines for depression treatment, and providing the woman with her diagnosis and information on how to seek help for herself. The primary outcomes are remission and severity of depression symptoms at the 6-month postnatal follow-up. Secondary outcomes include remission and severity of depression symptoms at the 3-month postnatal follow-up, functional disability, perceived social support, breastfeeding rates, infant height and weight, and costs of health care at the 3- and 6-month postnatal follow-ups. The primary analysis will be intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: The trials have the potential to strengthen the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based psychological treatment recommended by the World Health Organisation and delivered by peers for perinatal depression. The trials have the unique opportunity to overcome the shortage of human resources in global mental health and may advance our understanding about the use of peers who work in partnership with the existing health systems in low-resource settings.

trial registrationPakistan Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111915 (9 April 2014) India Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02104232 (1 April 2014).

Indexed as

Health Care CostsPeer InfluenceThinkingClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansIndiaIntention to Treat AnalysisMental HealthMental Health ServicesPakistanPerinatal CarePredictive Value of TestsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26604001
PMCPMC4659202
OpenAlexW2176196946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.