Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26603874›Full record

ReviewDrugs2015

Lipoglycopeptide Antibacterial Agents in Gram-Positive Infections: A Comparative Review.

Françoise Van Bambeke

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategy for enhanced production of A40926B0 inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Oritavancin safety: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS database.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New Insights onMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. New Antibiotics forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Dalbavancin Boosts the Ability of Neutrophils to Fight Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Françoise Van BambekePharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 73 B1.73.05, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. francoise.vanbambeke@uclouvain.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-7991
UCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oritavancin, telavancin, and dalbavancin are recently marketed lipoglycopeptides that exhibit remarkable differences to conventional molecules. While dalbavancin inhibits the late stages of peptidoglycan synthesis by mainly impairing transglycosylase activity, oritavancin and telavancin anchor in the bacterial membrane by the lipophilic side chain linked to their disaccharidic moiety, disrupting membrane integrity and causing bacteriolysis. Oritavancin keeps activity against vancomycin-resistant enterocococci, being a stronger inhibitor of transpeptidase than of transglycosylase activity. These molecules have potent activity against Gram-positive organisms, most notably staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and to some extent vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus), streptococci (including multidrug-resistant pneumococci), and Clostridia. All agents are indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and telavancin, for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. While telavancin is administered daily at 10 mg/kg, the remarkably long half-lives of oritavancin and dalbavancin allow for infrequent dosing (single dose of 1200 mg for oritavancin and 1000 mg at day 1 followed by 500 mg at day 8 for dalbavancin), which could be exploited in the future for outpatient therapy. Among possible safety issues evidenced during clinical development were an increased risk of developing osteomyelitis with oritavancin; taste disturbance, nephrotoxicity, and risk of corrected QT interval prolongation (especially in the presence of at-risk co-medications) with telavancin; and elevation of hepatic enzymes with dalbavancin. Interference with coagulation tests has been reported with oritavancin and telavancin. These drugs proved non-inferior to conventional treatments in clinical trials but their advantages may be better evidenced upon future evaluation in more severe infections.

Indexed as

AminoglycosidesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsGlycopeptidesGram-Positive BacteriaGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansLipoglycopeptidesTeicoplaninVancomycinAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsdalbavancinGlycopeptidesLipoglycopeptidesoritavancinTeicoplanintelavancinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID26603874
OpenAlexW2176137335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.