Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26603754›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Efficient Test and Visualization of Multi-Set Intersections.

Minghui Wang, Yongzhong Zhao, Bin Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 266 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
266citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

266 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 468 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

206 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minghui WangDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, NY 10029, USA.
Yongzhong ZhaoDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, NY 10029, USA.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn Institute of Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, NY 10029, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Integrative Network Biology Approaches to Identify, Characterize and Validate Molecular Subtypes in Alzheimer's DiseaseU01AG046170 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WANG, MINGHUI, ZHANG, BIN · 2013 to 2022
$26.0M
Omics-Based Predictive Modeling of Age-Dependent Outcome to Influenza InfectionU01AI111598 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GHEDIN, ELODIE · 2013 to 2017
$13.3M
Lung Adenocarcinoma Invasion GenomicsR01CA163772 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MASSION, PIERRE P., POWELL, CHARLES A. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163772NCI NIH HHS R01CA163772NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI111598NIAID NIH HHS U01AI111598-01NIA NIH HHS R01AG046170NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of sets of objects with shared features is a common operation in all disciplines. Analysis of intersections among multiple sets is fundamental for in-depth understanding of their complex relationships. However, so far no method has been developed to assess statistical significance of intersections among three or more sets. Moreover, the state-of-the-art approaches for visualization of multi-set intersections are not scalable. Here, we first developed a theoretical framework for computing the statistical distributions of multi-set intersections based upon combinatorial theory, and then accordingly designed a procedure to efficiently calculate the exact probabilities of multi-set intersections. We further developed multiple efficient and scalable techniques to visualize multi-set intersections and the corresponding intersection statistics. We implemented both the theoretical framework and the visualization techniques in a unified R software package, SuperExactTest. We demonstrated the utility of SuperExactTest through an intensive simulation study and a comprehensive analysis of seven independently curated cancer gene sets as well as six disease or trait associated gene sets identified by genome-wide association studies. We expect SuperExactTest developed by this study will have a broad range of applications in scientific data analysis in many disciplines.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInternetNeoplasmsPhenotypeUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID26603754
PMCPMC4658477
OpenAlexW2173168040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.