Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26603516›Full record

Trial reportBMC palliative care2015

INSPIRE (INvestigating Social and PractIcal suppoRts at the End of life): Pilot randomised trial of a community social and practical support intervention for adults with life-limiting illness.

Kathleen McLoughlin, Jim Rhatigan, Sinead McGilloway, Allan Kellehear, Michael Lucey, Feargal Twomey, Marian Conroy, Emillio Herrera-Molina, Suresh Kumar, Mairead Furlong and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC palliative care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 'Being with' or 'doing for'? How the role of an end-of-life volunteer befriender can impact patient wellbeing: interviews from a multiple qualitative case study (ELSA).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kathleen McLoughlinDepartment of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co., Kildare, Ireland. kathleen.mcloughlin@nuim.ie.
Jim RhatiganMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland. j.rhatigan@milfordcarecentre.ie.
Sinead McGillowayDepartment of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co., Kildare, Ireland. sinead.mcgilloway@nuim.ie.
Allan KellehearFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK. a.kellehear@bradford.ac.uk.
Michael LuceyMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland. m.lucey@milfordcarecentre.ie.
Feargal TwomeyMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland. f.twomey@milfordcarecentre.ie.
Marian ConroyMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland. m.conroy@milfordcarecentre.ie.
Emillio Herrera-MolinaNewhealth Foundation, Sevilla, Spain. emilio.herrera@newhealthfoundation.org.
Suresh KumarInstitute of Palliative Medicine, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. drsuresh.kumar@gmail.com.
Mairead FurlongDepartment of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co., Kildare, Ireland. mairead.furlong@nuim.ie.
Joanne CallinanMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland. j.callinan@milfordcarecentre.ie.
Max WatsonQueens University Belfast and Northern Ireland Hospice, Belfast, UK. alimaxuk@yahoo.com.
David CurrowFlinders University, Adelaide, Australia. david.currow@flinders.edu.au.
Christopher BaileyUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK. C.D.Bailey@soton.ac.uk.
National University of Ireland, Maynooth · IEFlinders University · AUNorthern Ireland Hospice · GBPallium India · INUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor most people, home is the preferred place of care and death. Despite the development of specialist palliative care and primary care models of community based service delivery, people who are dying, and their families/carers, can experience isolation, feel excluded from social circles and distanced from their communities. Loneliness and social isolation can have a detrimental impact on both health and quality of life. Internationally, models of social and practical support at the end of life are gaining momentum as a result of the Compassionate Communities movement. These models have not yet been subjected to rigorous evaluation. The aims of the study described in this protocol are: (1) to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and potential effectiveness of The Good Neighbour Partnership (GNP), a new volunteer-led model of social and practical care/support for community dwelling adults in Ireland who are living with advanced life-limiting illness; and (2) to pilot the method for a Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT).

designThe INSPIRE study will be conducted within the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework for the Evaluation of Complex Interventions (Phases 0-2) and includes an exploratory two-arm delayed intervention randomised controlled trial. Eighty patients and/or their carers will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: (I) Intervention: GNP in addition to standard care or (II) Control: Standard Care. Recipients of the GNP will be asked for their views on participating in both the study and the intervention. Quantitative and qualitative data will be gathered from both groups over eight weeks through face-to-face interviews which will be conducted before, during and after the intervention. The primary outcome is the effect of the intervention on social and practical need. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, loneliness, social support, social capital, unscheduled health service utilisation, caregiver burden, adverse impacts, and satisfaction with intervention. Volunteers engaged in the GNP will also be assessed in terms of their death anxiety, death self efficacy, self-reported knowledge and confidence with eleven skills considered necessary to be effective GNP volunteers. DISCUSSION: The INSPIRE study addresses an important knowledge gap, providing evidence on the efficacy, utility and acceptability of a unique model of social and practical support for people living at home, with advanced life-limiting illness. The findings will be important in informing the development (and evaluation) of similar service models and policy elsewhere both nationally and internationally.

trial registrationISRCTN18400594 18(th) February 2015.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeResearch DesignSocial SupportAdultCaregiversCommunity NetworksCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansIrelandMalePalliative CarePilot ProjectsResidence CharacteristicsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26603516
PMCPMC4658760
OpenAlexW2180026402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.