Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26603500›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2016

Multivariate test power approximations for balanced linear mixed models in studies with missing data.

Brandy M Ringham, Sarah M Kreidler, Keith E Muller, Deborah H Glueck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Power for balanced linear mixed models with complex missing data processes.Communications in statistics: theory and methods · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. On the Distribution of Summary Statistics for Missing Data.Communications in statistics: theory and methods · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brandy M RinghamDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, U.S.A.
Sarah M KreidlerNeptune and Company, Lakewood, CO, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-5166
Keith E MullerDepartment of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.
Deborah H GlueckDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, U.S.A.

Funding

UCLA Career Development Program in Cancer Prevention and Control ResearchR25CA087949 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BASTANI, ROSHAN · 2000 to 2014
$6.8M
Multilevel and Longitudinal Study Sample Size Tools for Behavioral ScientistsR01DE020832 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MULLER, KEITH E · 2011 to 2014
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA087949NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE020832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilevel and longitudinal studies are frequently subject to missing data. For example, biomarker studies for oral cancer may involve multiple assays for each participant. Assays may fail, resulting in missing data values that can be assumed to be missing completely at random. Catellier and Muller proposed a data analytic technique to account for data missing at random in multilevel and longitudinal studies. They suggested modifying the degrees of freedom for both the Hotelling-Lawley trace F statistic and its null case reference distribution. We propose parallel adjustments to approximate power for this multivariate test in studies with missing data. The power approximations use a modified non-central F statistic, which is a function of (i) the expected number of complete cases, (ii) the expected number of non-missing pairs of responses, or (iii) the trimmed sample size, which is the planned sample size reduced by the anticipated proportion of missing data. The accuracy of the method is assessed by comparing the theoretical results to the Monte Carlo simulated power for the Catellier and Muller multivariate test. Over all experimental conditions, the closest approximation to the empirical power of the Catellier and Muller multivariate test is obtained by adjusting power calculations with the expected number of complete cases. The utility of the method is demonstrated with a multivariate power analysis for a hypothetical oral cancer biomarkers study. We describe how to implement the method using standard, commercially available software products and give example code. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyMultivariate AnalysisSample SizeHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMonte Carlo Methodbalanced linear mixed modelsdata missing completely at randomHotelling-Lawley trace power approximationmultilevel and longitudinal studies

Identifiers

PMID26603500
PMCPMC4879605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.