Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26603289›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2015

Continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure for VAP prevention: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Saad Nseir, Leonardo Lorente, Miquel Ferrer, Anahita Rouzé, Oswaldo Gonzalez, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Alain Duhamel, Antoni Torres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Saad NseirCHU Lille, Centre de Réanimation, 59000, Lille, France. s-nseir@chru-lille.fr.
Leonardo LorenteIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, La Laguna, Spain. lorentemartin@msn.com.
Miquel FerrerRespiratory Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit, Department of Pneumology, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Thorax, Barcelona, Spain. mferrer@clinic.ub.es.
Anahita RouzéCHU Lille, Centre de Réanimation, 59000, Lille, France. anahita.rouze@chru-lille.fr.
Oswaldo GonzalezIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, La Laguna, Spain. oswaldojglez@gmail.com.
Gianluigi Li BassiRespiratory Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit, Department of Pneumology, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Thorax, Barcelona, Spain. glibassi@clinic.ub.es.
Alain DuhamelFaculté de Médecine, Université Lille, 59000, Lille, France. alain.duhamel59@gmail.com.
Antoni TorresRespiratory Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit, Department of Pneumology, Hospital Clinic, Institute of Thorax, Barcelona, Spain. atorres@clinic.ub.es.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESUniversité Lille Nord de France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderinflation of tracheal cuff is a risk factor for microaspiration of contaminated secretions and subsequent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The aim of this collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data is to determine the impact of continuous control of P cuff on the incidence of VAP.

methodsStudies were identified by searching PubMed and references of relevant articles. Data from 3 prospective controlled trials (two randomized and one quasi-randomized), which evaluated the impact of continuous control of P cuff on the incidence of VAP, were obtained and pooled together. Three different devices were used to continuously control P cuff. VAP was diagnosed using clinical, radiologic, and quantitative microbiological criteria. The impact of continuous control of P cuff on VAP was assessed by Cox regression analysis, stratified on trial.

results263 (48.4 %) patients received continuous control of P cuff, and 280 (51.5 %) patients received routine control of P cuff using a manometer. 36 (13.6 %) VAP were diagnosed in continuous control group, and 72 (25.7 %) in routine care group (HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.31-0.71, p < 0.001). However, heterogeneity was apparent in continuous control effect size across trials (I (2) = 58 %, p = 0.085). The number of patients needed to treat to prevent one VAP episode was 8. No significant impact of continuous control of P cuff was found on duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, or mortality.

conclusionContinuous control of P cuff might be beneficial in reducing the risk for VAP. However, no significant impact of continuous control of P cuff was found on duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, or mortality.

Indexed as

Critical careCuff pressureMechanical ventilationMeta-analysisMicroaspirationPneumonia

Identifiers

PMID26603289
PMCPMC4658343
OpenAlexW2173653260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.