Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26603162›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Antitumor action of temozolomide, ritonavir and aprepitant against human glioma cells.

Richard E Kast, Susana Ramiro, Sandra Lladó, Salvador Toro, Rafael Coveñas, Miguel Muñoz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The GPCR Connection: Linking Alzheimer's Disease and Glioblastoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Glioma and Peptidergic Systems: Oncogenic and Anticancer Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard E KastIIAIGC Headquarters, Dean of Studies, 22 Church St, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA. richarderickast@gmail.com.
Susana RamiroResearch Laboratory on Neuropeptides (IBIS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Avda. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Sandra LladóResearch Laboratory on Neuropeptides (IBIS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Avda. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Salvador ToroResearch Laboratory on Neuropeptides (IBIS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Avda. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Rafael CoveñasLaboratory of Neuroanatomy of the Peptidergic Systems (Lab. 14), Institute of Neurosciences of Castilla y León (INCYL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Miguel MuñozResearch Laboratory on Neuropeptides (IBIS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Avda. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013, Seville, Spain. mmunoz@cica.es.
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the effort to find better treatments for glioblastoma we tested several currently marketed non-chemotherapy drugs for their ability to enhance the standard cytotoxic drug currently used to treat glioblastoma- temozolomide. We tested four antiviral drugs- acyclovir, cidofovir, maraviroc, ritonavir, and an anti-emetic, aprepitant. We found no cytotoxicity of cidofovir and discussed possible reasons for discrepancy from previous findings of others. We also found no cytotoxicity from acyclovir or maraviroc also in contradistinction to predictions. Cytotoxicity to glioma cell line GAMG for temozolomide alone was 14%, aprepitant alone 7%, ritonavir alone 14%, while temozolomide + aprepitant was 19%, temozolomide + ritonavir 34%, ritonavir + aprepitant 64 %, and all three, temozolomide + ritonavir + aprepitant 78%. We conclude that a remarkable synergy exists between aprepitant and ritonavir. Given the long clinical experience with these two well-tolerated drugs in treating non-cancer conditions, and the current median survival of glioblastoma of 2 years, a trial is warranted of adding these two simple drugs to current standard treatment with temozolomide.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingApoptosisAprepitantBrain NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDacarbazineGlioblastomaHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMorpholinesRitonavirTemozolomideTumor Cells, CulturedAntiemeticsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAprepitantDacarbazineHIV Protease InhibitorsMorpholinesRitonavirTemozolomideAprepitantCombination therapyGlioblastomaRitonavirTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID26603162
OpenAlexW2174504148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.