Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26601982›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2017

Revisiting the Healthy Migrant Paradox in Perinatal Health Outcomes Through a Scoping Review in a Recent Host Country.

Sol P Juárez, Gaby Ortiz-Barreda, Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez, Elena Ronda-Pérez

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Refugee Births and the Migrant Health Effect in Syracuse NY.Maternal and child health journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sol P JuárezCentre for Health Equity Studies, Stockholm University/Karolinska Institute, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. Sol.juarez@chess.su.se.
Gaby Ortiz-BarredaDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Andrés A Agudelo-SuárezPublic Health Research Group, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain.
Elena Ronda-PérezPublic Health Research Group, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ample evidence shows that, in many developed countries, immigrants have similar or better perinatal health outcomes than natives despite facing socioeconomic disadvantages in the host country ("healthy migrant paradox" -HMP). This scoping review aims to: (1) summarize the literature on perinatal health among immigrants and natives in Spain and (2) examine whether there is evidence of the HMP in a context of recent migration. A total of 25 articles published between 1998 and 2014 were reviewed. Overall, we found evidence of the HMP in low birthweight and to a lesser extent in preterm, though the patterns vary by origin, but not in macrosomia and post-term. The results are consistent across settings, levels of adjustment, and birth year. Policies should be oriented towards identifying the modifiable risk factors leading to a higher risk of macrosomia and post-term among immigrants.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant HealthInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSpainBirthweightGestational ageImmigrantsPerinatal healthSpain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.