Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26601786›Full record

Trial reportJournal of experimental child psychology2016

The effects of distraction and reappraisal on children's parasympathetic regulation of sadness and fear.

Elizabeth L Davis, Laura E Quiñones-Camacho, Kristin A Buss

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Multi-Component Model of Emotion Response Convergence: Implications for the Development of Psychopathology.Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth L DavisUniversity of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. Electronic address: elizabeth.davis@ucr.edu.
Laura E Quiñones-CamachoUniversity of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Kristin A BussThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16801, USA.

Funding

Risk for Internalizing during Kindergarten for Children with Dysregulated FearR01MH075750 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BUSS, KRISTIN A · 2006 to 2010
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH075750NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH075750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children commonly experience negative emotions like sadness and fear, and much recent empirical attention has been devoted to understanding the factors supporting and predicting effective emotion regulation. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), a cardiac index of parasympathetic function, has emerged as a key physiological correlate of children's self-regulation. But little is known about how children's use of specific cognitive emotion regulation strategies corresponds to concurrent parasympathetic regulation (i.e., RSA reactivity while watching an emotion-eliciting video). The current study describes an experimental paradigm in which 101 5- and 6-year-olds were randomly assigned to one of three different emotion regulation conditions: Control, Distraction, or Reappraisal. All children watched a sad film and a scary film (order counterbalanced), and children in the Distraction and Reappraisal conditions received instructions to deploy the target strategy to manage sadness/fear while they watched. Consistent with predictions, children assigned to use either emotion regulation strategy showed greater RSA augmentation from baseline than children in the Control condition (all children showed an overall increase in RSA levels from baseline), suggesting enhanced parasympathetic calming when children used distraction or reappraisal to regulate sadness and fear. But this pattern was found only among children who viewed the sad film before the scary film. Among children who viewed the scary film first, reappraisal promoted marginally better parasympathetic regulation of fear (no condition differences emerged for parasympathetic regulation of sadness when the sad film was viewed second). Results are discussed in terms of their implications for our understanding of children's emotion regulation and affective physiology.

Indexed as

AttentionChildChild, PreschoolEmotionsFearFemaleHumansMaleParasympathetic Nervous SystemRespiratory Sinus ArrhythmiaChildhoodDistractionEmotion regulation strategiesParasympathetic regulationReappraisalRSA

Identifiers

PMID26601786
PMCPMC4666770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.