Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26601620›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2016

The molecular basis for centromere identity and function.

Kara L McKinley, Iain M Cheeseman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 437 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
437citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

437 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Dual Roads of CENP-A for Centromere Identification.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  18. Germline hypomethylation shapes dynamic CpG reservoirs in ape genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

377 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kara L McKinleyWhitehead Institute and Department of Biology, MIT, Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Iain M CheesemanWhitehead Institute and Department of Biology, MIT, Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

Funding

Molecular Analysis of the Kinetochore-Microtubule InterfaceR01GM088313 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI CHEESEMAN, IAIN MCPHERSON · 2009 to 2017
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM088313NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The centromere is the region of the chromosome that directs its segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Although the functional importance of the centromere has been appreciated for more than 130 years, elucidating the molecular features and properties that enable centromeres to orchestrate chromosome segregation is an ongoing challenge. Most eukaryotic centromeres are defined epigenetically and require the presence of nucleosomes containing the histone H3 variant centromere protein A (CENP-A; also known as CENH3). Ongoing work is providing important molecular insights into the central requirements for centromere identity and propagation, and the mechanisms by which centromeres recruit kinetochores to connect to spindle microtubules.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentromereDNAEpigenesis, GeneticHumansKinetochoresModels, BiologicalDNA

Identifiers

PMID26601620
PMCPMC8603311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.