ReviewScience progress2015
Between pathways and networks lies context: implications for precision medicine.
Review in Science progress, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine, broadly defined as considering individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person in disease prevention and selection of suitable medical intervention, shows strong promise in the treatment of cancer Selecting therapies is complicated by multiple routes to gene dysregulation, which manifest in the individual patient within the many different types of genomic measurements. Additionally, multiple mutations exist in patients, aphenomenon known as oncogenic collaboration, which further complicates the selection of therapy. In this article, we discuss current approaches using biological pathways and networks to unify the many types of OMICs data. We argue that a contextual approach combining cancer pathways and networks could lead to a proper understanding of the biology of this significant disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.