Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26601235›Full record

ReviewScience advances2015

Nanodiamonds: The intersection of nanotechnology, drug development, and personalized medicine.

Dean Ho, Chung-Huei Katherine Wang, Edward Kai-Hua Chow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical validation of a nanodiamond-embedded thermoplastic biomaterial.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ultrasmall PEI-Decorated BiFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dean HoDivision of Oral Biology and Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. ; Department of Bioengineering, UCLA School of Engineering and Applied Science, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. ; The Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. ; California NanoSystems Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. ; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Chung-Huei Katherine WangBRIM Biotechnology Inc., Taipei 11560, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Edward Kai-Hua ChowCancer Science Institute of Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore. ; Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 177599, Singapore. ; National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore 119082, Singapore.

Funding

Theranostic Magnetic Nanostructures for the Molecular Imaging of CancerU54CA151880 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MIRKIN, CHAD A. · 2010 to 2014
$11.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of nanomedicine in cellular, preclinical, and clinical studies has led to exciting advances ranging from fundamental to translational, particularly in the field of cancer. Many of the current barriers in cancer treatment are being successfully addressed using nanotechnology-modified compounds. These barriers include drug resistance leading to suboptimal intratumoral retention, poor circulation times resulting in decreased efficacy, and off-target toxicity, among others. The first clinical nanomedicine advances to overcome these issues were based on monotherapy, where small-molecule and nucleic acid delivery demonstrated substantial improvements over unmodified drug administration. Recent preclinical studies have shown that combination nanotherapies, composed of either multiple classes of nanomaterials or a single nanoplatform functionalized with several therapeutic agents, can image and treat tumors with improved efficacy over single-compound delivery. Among the many promising nanomaterials that are being developed, nanodiamonds have received increasing attention because of the unique chemical-mechanical properties on their faceted surfaces. More recently, nanodiamond-based drug delivery has been included in the rational and systematic design of optimal therapeutic combinations using an implicitly de-risked drug development platform technology, termed Phenotypic Personalized Medicine-Drug Development (PPM-DD). The application of PPM-DD to rapidly identify globally optimized drug combinations successfully addressed a pervasive challenge confronting all aspects of drug development, both nano and non-nano. This review will examine various nanomaterials and the use of PPM-DD to optimize the efficacy and safety of current and future cancer treatment. How this platform can accelerate combinatorial nanomedicine and the broader pharmaceutical industry toward unprecedented clinical impact will also be discussed.

Indexed as

combination therapyDrug DevelopmentnanodiamondnanomedicineNanosciencepersonalized medicinephenotypeprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID26601235
PMCPMC4643796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.