Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26600975›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology2015

Gastrointestinal dysbiosis and the use of fecal microbial transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection.

L Patrick Schenck, Paul L Beck, Justin A MacDonald

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

L Patrick SchenckL Patrick Schenck, Gastrointestinal Research Group at the Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Paul L BeckL Patrick Schenck, Gastrointestinal Research Group at the Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Justin A MacDonaldL Patrick Schenck, Gastrointestinal Research Group at the Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of antibiotics on the human gut microbiota is a significant concern. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea has been on the rise for the past few decades with the increasing usage of antibiotics. Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) have become one of the most prominent types of infectious diarrheal disease, with dramatically increased incidence in both the hospital and community setting worldwide. Studies show that variability in the innate host response may in part impact upon CDI severity in patients. That being said, CDI is a disease that shows the most prominent links to alterations to the gut microbiota, in both cause and treatment. With recurrence rates still relatively high, it is important to explore alternative therapies to CDI. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and other types of bacteriotherapy have become exciting avenues of treatment for CDI. Recent clinical trials have generated excitement for the use of FMT as a therapeutic option for CDI; however, the exact components of the human gut microbiota needed for protection against CDI have remained elusive. Additional investigations on the effects of antibiotics on the human gut microbiota and subsequent CDI will help reduce the socioeconomic burden of CDI and potentially lead to new therapeutic modalities.

Indexed as

Antibiotic-associated diarrheaBacteriotherapyDysbiosisFecal microbial transplantHuman gut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID26600975
PMCPMC4644881
OpenAlexW2174006967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.