ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2015
Future perspectives in target-specific immunotherapies of myasthenia gravis.
Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic challenges and unmet needs in the management of myasthenia gravis: an Italian expert opinion.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Review
- Responsiveness to Tocilizumab in Anti-Acetylcholine Receptor-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.Aging and disease · 2024Article
- Gut bacterial microbiota in patients with myasthenia gravis: results from the MYBIOM study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2021Article
- Novel Treatments in Myasthenia Gravis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- Myasthenia Gravis: From the Viewpoint of Pathogenicity Focusing on Acetylcholine Receptor Clustering, Trans-Synaptic Homeostasis and Synaptic Stability.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020Article
- Immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis in the era of biologics.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2019Review
- CIDP, myasthenia gravis, and membranous glomerulonephritis - three autoimmune disorders in one patient: a case report.BMC neurology · 2018Article
- When myasthenia gravis is deemed refractory: clinical signposts and treatment strategies.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018Review
- Bortezomib in severe MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis: first clinical experience.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2017Article
- Profile of upregulated inflammatory proteins in sera of Myasthenia Gravis patients.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Mechanisms of Autoantibody-Induced Pathology.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Anti-Musk Positive Myasthenia Gravis and Three Semiological Cardinal Signs.Neurology international · 2016Article
- [Cell depletion and myoablation for neuroimmunological diseases].Der Nervenarzt · 2016Review
- Precision medicine in myasthenia graves: begin from the data precision.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in the Chronic Management of Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.PloS one · 2016Article
- Neuro-Immunotherapies: A 30-year Retrospective of an Overwhelming Success and a Brighter Future.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by complement-fixing antibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChR); antigen-specific CD4+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs) and T helper (Th) 17+ cells are essential in antibody production. Target-specific therapeutic interventions should therefore be directed against antibodies, B cells, complement and molecules associated with T cell signaling. Even though the progress in the immunopathogenesis of the disease probably exceeds any other autoimmune disorder, MG is still treated with traditional drugs or procedures that exert a non-antigen specific immunosuppression or immunomodulation. Novel biological agents currently on the market, directed against the following molecular pathways, are relevant and specific therapeutic targets that can be tested in MG: (a) T cell intracellular signaling molecules, such as anti-CD52, anti-interleukin (IL) 2 receptors, anti- costimulatory molecules, and anti-Janus tyrosine kinases (JAK1, JAK3) that block the intracellular cascade associated with T-cell activation; (b) B cells and their trophic factors, directed against key B-cell molecules; (c) complement C3 or C5, intercepting the destructive effect of complement-fixing antibodies; (d) cytokines and cytokine receptors, such as those targeting IL-6 which promotes antibody production and IL-17, or the p40 subunit of IL-12/1L-23 that affect regulatory T cells; and (e) T and B cell transmigration molecules associated with lymphocyte egress from the lymphoid organs. All drugs against these molecular pathways require testing in controlled trials, although some have already been tried in small case series. Construction of recombinant AChR antibodies that block binding of the pathogenic antibodies, thereby eliminating complement and antibody-depended-cell-mediated cytotoxicity, are additional novel molecular tools that require exploration in experimental MG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.