Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26600824›Full record

ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC2015

A scoping review of research on the prescribing practice of Canadian pharmacists.

Chowdhury Farhana Faruquee, Lisa M Guirguis

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of pharmacists in deprescribing benzodiazepines: A scoping review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Medication management of chronic pain: A comparison of 2 care delivery models.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chowdhury Farhana FaruqueeFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Lisa M GuirguisFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacists in Canada have been prescribing since 2007. This review aims to explore the volume, array and nature of research activity on Canadian pharmacist prescribing and to identify gaps in the existing literature.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review to examine the literature on prescribing by pharmacists in Canada according to methodological trends, research areas and key findings. We searched for peer-reviewed research articles and abstracts in the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases without any date limitations. A standardized form was used to extract information.

resultsWe identified 156 articles; of these, 26 articles and 12 abstracts met inclusion criteria. One-half of the research studies (20) used quantitative methods, including surveys, trials and experimental designs; 11 studies used qualitative methods and 7 used other methods. Research on pharmacist prescribing demonstrated an improvement in patient outcomes (13 studies), varied stakeholder perceptions (10 studies) and factors that influence this practice change (11 studies). Pharmacist prescribing was adopted when pharmacists practised patient-centred care. Stakeholders held contrasting perceptions of pharmacist prescribing. DISCUSSION: Canadian research has demonstrated the benefit of pharmacist prescribing on patient outcomes, which is not present in the international literature. Future research may consider a meta-analysis addressing the impact on patient health. Gaps in research include comparisons between provinces, effects on physicians' services, overall patient safety and access to health care systems and economic implications for society.

conclusionA growing body of research on pharmacist prescribing has captured the early impact of prescribing on patient outcomes, perceptions of practice and practice change. Opportunities exist for pan-Canadian research that examines the system impact.

Identifiers

PMID26600824
PMCPMC4637852
OpenAlexW2180529548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.