Retraction Note to: Plant regeneration in Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. et Fernand. from embryogenic callus and cell suspension culture and assessment of genetic fidelity of plants derived through somatic embryogenesis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. High Efficiency Regeneration System from Blueberry Leaves and Stems.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Article
2. The pleasure of excellence-led growth and the pain of enforcing publishing ethics: the experience of PMBP.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Retraction of
  Plant regeneration in Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. et Fernand. from embryogenic callus and cell suspension culture and assessment of genetic fidelity of plants derived through somatic embryogenesis.2012

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract