ArticlePloS one2015
A Prospective Multicentre Study to Improve Postoperative Pain: Identification of Potentialities and Problems.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Perioperative Pain Management With Multi-discipline Team(pMDT) in Thoracic Surgery: a Multi-center,Prospective, Observational Study--------For the Baseline Investigation and Technical Preparation Stage
Perioperative Pain Management With Multi-discipline Team(pMDT) in Thoracic Surgery: a Multi-center,Prospective, Observational Study--The Process Implementation Stage
Efficacy of Percutaneous Electrical Neurostimulation (PENS)of the Auricle as an Opioid Sparing Postoperative Analgesic Technique in Cancer Endometrium and Cancer Cervix
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of XGBoost in the prediction of acute postoperative pain after major noncardiac surgery in older patients.Molecular painTrial
- [Health services research in acute pain medicine : Where do we come from in Germany?]Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Pain mechanisms in the transgender individual: a review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Effect of nalbuphine on patient controlled intravenous analgesia after radical resection of colon cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- [High pain expectation and impairment from pre-existing pain are risk factors for severe postoperative pain : Results of a study using the Lübeck Pain Risk Questionnaire].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- [Delegation of medical activities in acute pain therapy].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Review
- Disparity between High Satisfaction and Severe Pain in Patients after Caesarean Section: A Prospective Observational-Controlled Investigation.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2018Article
- An observational study to evaluate the prescription pattern of analgesics used in the perioperative period in a tertiary care hospital.Perspectives in clinical researchArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies still indicate insufficient pain management after surgery, e.g., in patients after small- or medium-size operations. Yet it is still uncertain if postoperative pain based on patient-related outcomes can be improved by implementing guideline-related programmes in a multicentre approach. Adult patients in six hospitals in one German city were included in this prospective study. Data collection took place twice in each hospital, once before and once after implementation of concepts and in-house training. Pain and pain-related aspects were assessed one day after surgery and compared between the pre- and post-test group including subgroup analysis of certain surgical procedures by using Student's t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square tests (alphatwo-tailed = 0.05). Overall, pain at rest and during movement was slightly lower after the intervention. Significant changes were observed after thoracic surgery, small joint surgery and other minor surgical procedures. The rather moderate decrease in pain likely relates to a reasonable pre-existing pain management and to detached improvements in certain patient subgroups. Interestingly, specific analyses revealed significantly lower post-test pain as compared to pre-test pain only in patients without pre-existing chronic pain. Side effects related to pain medication were significantly lower after intervention. Our data show, for the first time, benefits of a perioperative teaching programme in a multicentre approach. Pain ratings improved mainly in specific subgroups of patients, e.g., small surgical procedures and patients without preoperative pain. Thus, general improvement is possible but special attention should be paid to the group of patients with preoperative pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.