Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26600464›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Prospective Multicentre Study to Improve Postoperative Pain: Identification of Potentialities and Problems.

Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Patrick Kutschar, Nadja Nestler, Juergen Osterbrink

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03759275 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Pain Management With Multi-discipline Team(pMDT) in Thoracic Surgery: a Multi-center,Prospective, Observational Study--------For the Baseline Investigation and Technical Preparation Stage

TypeobservationalSponsorPeking University People's HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled480ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmspMDT(Baseline Investigation)
NCT03761550 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Pain Management With Multi-discipline Team(pMDT) in Thoracic Surgery: a Multi-center,Prospective, Observational Study--The Process Implementation Stage

TypeobservationalSponsorPeking University People's HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled480ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmspMDT(Process Implementation)
NCT05742711 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Percutaneous Electrical Neurostimulation (PENS)of the Auricle as an Opioid Sparing Postoperative Analgesic Technique in Cancer Endometrium and Cancer Cervix

TypeinterventionalSponsorDyAnsys, Inc.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled48ConditionsCancer of Endometrium, Cancer of CervixArmsPrimary Relief, Primary Relief - Sham Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Pain mechanisms in the transgender individual: a review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esther Pogatzki-ZahnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Patrick KutscharInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Nadja NestlerInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Juergen OsterbrinkInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies still indicate insufficient pain management after surgery, e.g., in patients after small- or medium-size operations. Yet it is still uncertain if postoperative pain based on patient-related outcomes can be improved by implementing guideline-related programmes in a multicentre approach. Adult patients in six hospitals in one German city were included in this prospective study. Data collection took place twice in each hospital, once before and once after implementation of concepts and in-house training. Pain and pain-related aspects were assessed one day after surgery and compared between the pre- and post-test group including subgroup analysis of certain surgical procedures by using Student's t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square tests (alphatwo-tailed = 0.05). Overall, pain at rest and during movement was slightly lower after the intervention. Significant changes were observed after thoracic surgery, small joint surgery and other minor surgical procedures. The rather moderate decrease in pain likely relates to a reasonable pre-existing pain management and to detached improvements in certain patient subgroups. Interestingly, specific analyses revealed significantly lower post-test pain as compared to pre-test pain only in patients without pre-existing chronic pain. Side effects related to pain medication were significantly lower after intervention. Our data show, for the first time, benefits of a perioperative teaching programme in a multicentre approach. Pain ratings improved mainly in specific subgroups of patients, e.g., small surgical procedures and patients without preoperative pain. Thus, general improvement is possible but special attention should be paid to the group of patients with preoperative pain.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementFemaleGermanyHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMovementOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRestSurgical Procedures, Operative

Identifiers

PMID26600464
PMCPMC4658204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.