Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26600384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Incidence of Type II CRISPR1-Cas Systems in Enterococcus Is Species-Dependent.

Casandra Lyons, Nicole Raustad, Mario A Bustos, Michael Shiaris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CRISPR-Cas systems in enterococci.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic analysis ofMolecular biology research communications · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Role of CRISPR-Cas system on antibiotic resistance patterns of Enterococcus faecalis.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Epidemiology ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Enterococcal Genetics.Microbiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Casandra LyonsBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nicole RaustadBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mario A BustosBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Michael ShiarisBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
University of Massachusetts Boston · US

Funding

Roxbury-BunkerHill-UMass Boston Bridges to the BaccalaureateR25GM075306 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI JAVDEKAR, CHITRA N, POLLACK, ALEXIA EDITH · 2006 to 2020
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM075306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas systems, which obstruct both viral infection and incorporation of mobile genetic elements by horizontal transfer, are a specific immune response common to prokaryotes. Antiviral protection by CRISPR-Cas comes at a cost, as horizontally-acquired genes may increase fitness and provide rapid adaptation to habitat change. To date, investigations into the prevalence of CRISPR have primarily focused on pathogenic and clinical bacteria, while less is known about CRISPR dynamics in commensal and environmental species. We designed PCR primers and coupled these with DNA sequencing of products to detect and characterize the presence of cas1, a universal CRISPR-associated gene and proxy for the Type II CRISPR1-Cas system, in environmental and non-clinical Enterococcus isolates. CRISPR1-cas1 was detected in approximately 33% of the 275 strains examined, and differences in CRISPR1 carriage between species was significant. Incidence of cas1 in E. hirae was 73%, nearly three times that of E. faecalis (23.6%) and 10 times more frequent than in E. durans (7.1%). Also, this is the first report of CRISPR1 presence in E. durans, as well as in the plant-associated species E. casseliflavus and E. sulfureus. Significant differences in CRISPR1-cas1 incidence among Enterococcus species support the hypothesis that there is a tradeoff between protection and adaptability. The differences in the habitats of enterococcal species may exert varying selective pressure that results in a species-dependent distribution of CRISPR-Cas systems.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCRISPR-Cas SystemsEnterococcusGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySequence AlignmentSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26600384
PMCPMC4658022
OpenAlexW2265575562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.