Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26600269›Full record

ReviewBiorheology2015

In microfluidico: Recreating in vivo hemodynamics using miniaturized devices.

Shu Zhu, Bradley A Herbig, Ruizhi Li, Thomas V Colace, Ryan W Muthard, Keith B Neeves, Scott L Diamond

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biorheology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Human Vascular Injury-on-a-Chip Model of Hemostasis.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Getting a good view:Platelets · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shu ZhuInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bradley A HerbigInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ruizhi LiInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas V ColaceInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ryan W MuthardInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Keith B NeevesDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA.
Scott L DiamondInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USColorado School of Mines · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training in Cardiovascular BiologyT32HL007954 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIES, PETER FRANCIS · 2000 to 2019
$9.9M
Blood Systems BiologyR01HL103419 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DIAMOND, SCOTT L · 2010 to 2019
$7.4M
A Systems Biology Approach to Predicting Bleeding in HemophiliaR01HL120728 · NHLBI · COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES · PI DI PAOLA, JORGE A, FOGELSON, AARON L · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103419NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120728NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic devices create precisely controlled reactive blood flows and typically involve: (i) validated anticoagulation/pharmacology protocols, (ii) defined reactive surfaces, (iii) defined flow-transport regimes, and (iv) optical imaging. An 8-channel device can be run at constant flow rate or constant pressure drop for blood perfusion over a patterned collagen, collagen/kaolin, or collagen/tissue factor (TF) to measure platelet, thrombin, and fibrin dynamics during clot growth. A membrane-flow device delivers a constant flux of platelet agonists or coagulation enzymes into flowing blood. A trifurcated device sheaths a central blood flow on both sides with buffer, an ideal approach for on-chip recalcification of citrated blood or drug delivery. A side-view device allows clotting on a porous collagen/TF plug at constant pressure differential across the developing clot. The core-shell architecture of clots made in mouse models can be replicated in this device using human blood. For pathological flows, a stenosis device achieves shear rates of >100,000 s(-1) to drive plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) to form thick long fibers on collagen. Similarly, a micropost-impingement device creates extreme elongational and shear flows for VWF fiber formation without collagen. Overall, microfluidics are ideal for studies of clotting, bleeding, fibrin polymerization/fibrinolysis, cell/clot mechanics, adhesion, mechanobiology, and reaction-transport dynamics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood CirculationCollagenHemodynamicsHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMiniaturizationThromboplastinvon Willebrand FactorCollagenThromboplastinvon Willebrand FactorHarry Goldsmithhemorheologymicrofluidicsplateletvon Willebrand factor

Identifiers

PMID26600269
PMCPMC4814229
OpenAlexW2189195898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.