Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26599789›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Vaginal Microbiome Characterization of Nellore Cattle Using Metagenomic Analysis.

Mateus Laguardia-Nascimento, Kelly Moreira Grillo Ribeiro Branco, Marcela Ribeiro Gasparini, Silvia Giannattasio-Ferraz, Laura Rabelo Leite, Flávio Marcos Gomes Araujo, Anna Christina de Matos Salim, Jacques Robert Nicoli, Guilherme Corrêa de Oliveira, Edel Figueiredo Barbosa-Stancioli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Peptidoglycan derived fromFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Describing the Reproductive Microbiome ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mateus Laguardia-NascimentoDepartmento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Kelly Moreira Grillo Ribeiro BrancoDepartmento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Marcela Ribeiro GaspariniDepartmento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Silvia Giannattasio-FerrazDepartmento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Laura Rabelo LeiteRené Rachou Research Center - Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Flávio Marcos Gomes AraujoRené Rachou Research Center - Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Anna Christina de Matos SalimRené Rachou Research Center - Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Jacques Robert NicoliDepartmento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Guilherme Corrêa de OliveiraRené Rachou Research Center - Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Edel Figueiredo Barbosa-StancioliDepartmento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding of microbial communities inhabiting cattle vaginal tract may lead to a better comprehension of bovine physiology and reproductive health being of great economic interest. Up to date, studies involving cattle microbiota are focused on the gastrointestinal tract, and little is known about the vaginal microbiota. This study aimed to investigate the vaginal microbiome in Nellore cattle, heifers and cows, pregnant and non-pregnant, using a culture independent approach. The main bacterial phyla found were Firmicutes (~40-50%), Bacteroidetes (~15-25%) and Proteobacteria (~5-25%), in addition to ~10-20% of non-classified bacteria. 45-55% of the samples were represented by only ten OTUs: Aeribacillus, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Ruminococcus, Rikenella, Alistipes, Bacillus, Eubacterium, Prevotella and non-classified bacteria. Interestingly, microbiota from all 20 animals could be grouped according to the respiratory metabolism of the main OTUs found, creating three groups of vaginal microbiota in cattle. Archaeal samples were dominated by the Methanobrevibacter genus (Euryarchaeota, ~55-70%). Ascomycota was the main fungal phylum (~80-95%) and Mycosphaerella the most abundant genus (~70-85%). Hormonal influence was not clear, but a tendency for the reduction of bacterial and increase of archaeal populations in pregnant animals was observed. Eukaryotes did not vary significantly between pregnant and non-pregnant animals, but tended to be more abundant on cows than on heifers. The present work describes a great microbial variability in the vaginal community among the evaluated animals and groups (heifers and cows, pregnant and non-pregnant), which is significantly different from the findings previously reported using culture dependent methods, pointing out the need for further studies on this issue. The microbiome found also indicates that the vaginal colonization appears to be influenced by the gastrointestinal community.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMicrobiotaAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaCattleFemaleFungiGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyVagina

Identifiers

PMID26599789
PMCPMC4657983
OpenAlexW2273873162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.