SynthesisPloS one2015
Impact of Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness Interventions on Birth with a Skilled Attendant: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital technology-assisted labor support in delivery rooms on maternal pain and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of prenatal education on fear of childbirth, pain intensity during labour and childbirth experience: a scoping review using systematic approach and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- Male partners' participation in birth preparedness and complication readiness in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Pooled it
- The associations between intimate partner violence and maternal health care service utilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2019Pooled it
- Involving men to improve maternal and newborn health: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Factors influencing implementation of interventions to promote birth preparedness and complication readiness.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness among Pregnant Women in a Secondary Health Facility in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.BioMed research international · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Population-oriented health promotion and disease prevention interventions in primary healthcare: a scoping review of reviews.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Article
- Wealth-based inequality in maternal health service utilization among ever-married women of reproductive age in Somaliland; secondary analysis of the 2020 Demographic and Health Survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness and complications readiness among mobile Pokot nomadic pastoralist pregnant women in Tiaty Sub-County, Baringo County-Kenya.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Interventions to Enhance Facility Deliveries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- Determinants of birth preparedness and complications readiness among mothers attending the antenatal care clinic at Katakwi General Hospital, Eastern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Determinants of potential life-threatening maternal conditions (PLTCs) in Tigray, northern Ethiopia: a case‒control study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Childbirth preparation and its facilitating and inhibiting factors from the perspectives of pregnant and postpartum women in Tabriz-Iran: a qualitative study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Birth preparedness and its association with place of delivery among women in rural and urban communities of Ogun east senatorial district Nigeria.African health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreased preparedness for birth and complications is an essential part of antenatal care and has the potential to increase birth with a skilled attendant. We conducted a systematic review of studies to assess the effect of birth preparedness and complication readiness interventions on increasing birth with a skilled attendant.
methodsPubMed, Embase, CINAHL and grey literature were searched for studies from 2000 to 2012 using a broad range of search terms. Studies were included with diverse designs and intervention strategies that contained an element of birth preparedness and complication readiness. Data extracted included population, setting, study design, outcomes, intervention description, type of intervention strategy and funding sources. Quality of the studies was assessed. The studies varied in BP/CR interventions, design, use of control groups, data collection methods, and outcome measures. We therefore deemed meta-analysis was not appropriate and conducted a narrative synthesis of the findings.
resultsThirty-three references encompassing 20 different intervention programmes were included, of which one programmatic element was birth preparedness and complication readiness. Implementation strategies were diverse and included facility-, community-, or home-based services. Thirteen studies resulted in an increase in birth with a skilled attendant or facility birth. The majority of authors reported an increase in knowledge on birth preparedness and complication readiness.
conclusionsBirth Preparedness and Complication Readiness interventions can increase knowledge of preparations for birth and complications; however this does not always correspond to an increase in the use of a skilled attendant at birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.