Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26599608›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2015

Clinical, virological and epidemiological characteristics of rhinovirus infections in early childhood: A comparison between non-hospitalised and hospitalised children.

Andrea H L Bruning, Xiomara V Thomas, Lonneke van der Linden, Joanne G Wildenbeest, René P Minnaar, Rogier R Jansen, Menno D de Jong, Peter J Sterk, Marc P van der Schee, Katja C Wolthers and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prednisolone for the first rhinovirus-induced wheezing and 4-year asthma risk: A randomized trial.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Molecular Epidemiology and Clinical Phylogenetics of Rhinoviruses Among Paediatric Cases in Sydney, Australia.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A molecular epidemiological perspective of rhinovirus types circulating in Amsterdam from 2007 to 2012.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea H L BruningDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.h.bruning@amc.uva.nl.
Xiomara V ThomasDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lonneke van der LindenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joanne G WildenbeestDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
René P MinnaarDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rogier R JansenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Menno D de JongDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter J SterkDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc P van der ScheeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katja C WolthersDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dasja PajkrtDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have been published regarding the epidemiology and clinical significance of the different rhinovirus (RV) species (-A, -B and -C). However, data on RV types and the associations with clinical outcome in young children are limited. Here, we investigated the clinical, virological and epidemiological characteristics of RV infections in young children with mild or asymptomatic infection (non-hospitalised children) and in symptomatic young children admitted to the hospital.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate associations between different characteristics of RV infections and clinical outcome in young children. STUDY

designRV-infected children were retrospectively selected from a Dutch birth cohort (EUROPA-study) and from hospitalised children admitted to the hospital because of respiratory symptoms. In total 120 RV-typed samples could be selected from 65 non-hospitalised and 49 hospitalised children between November 2009 and December 2012.

resultsRV-A was the predominant species in both study populations, followed closely by RV-C. RV-B was observed only sporadically. The distribution of the RV species was comparable in non-hospitalised and hospitalised children. In children with respiratory distress who required ICU-admission the distribution of RV species did not differ significantly from the non-hospitalised children. No predominant RV type was present in non-hospitalised nor hospitalised children. However, hospitalised children were younger, had more often an underlying illness, a higher RV load and more frequently a bacterial co-infection.

conclusionsClinical outcome of RV infected young children was not related to RV species or types, but may more likely be influenced by multiple (host-specific) factors.

Indexed as

Child, HospitalizedChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNetherlandsPicornaviridae InfectionsPrognosisRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesRhinovirusViral LoadClinical outcomeEpidemiologyRespiratory tract infectionRhinovirus

Identifiers

PMID26599608
PMCPMC7185867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.