Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26599280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Urinary Volatile Organic Compounds for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Tanzeela Khalid, Raphael Aggio, Paul White, Ben De Lacy Costello, Raj Persad, Huda Al-Kateb, Peter Jones, Chris S Probert, Norman Ratcliffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tanzeela KhalidDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Raphael AggioInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Paul WhiteInstitute of Biosensor Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ben De Lacy CostelloInstitute of Biosensor Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Raj PersadBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Huda Al-KatebInstitute of Biosensor Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Peter JonesInstitute of Biosensor Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Chris S ProbertInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Norman RatcliffeInstitute of Biosensor Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emanating from urine samples to determine whether they can be used to classify samples into those from prostate cancer and non-cancer groups. Participants were men referred for a trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy because of an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level or abnormal findings on digital rectal examination. Urine samples were collected from patients with prostate cancer (n = 59) and cancer-free controls (n = 43), on the day of their biopsy, prior to their procedure. VOCs from the headspace of basified urine samples were extracted using solid-phase micro-extraction and analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Classifiers were developed using Random Forest (RF) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classification techniques. PSA alone had an accuracy of 62-64% in these samples. A model based on 4 VOCs, 2,6-dimethyl-7-octen-2-ol, pentanal, 3-octanone, and 2-octanone, was marginally more accurate 63-65%. When combined, PSA level and these four VOCs had mean accuracies of 74% and 65%, using RF and LDA, respectively. With repeated double cross-validation, the mean accuracies fell to 71% and 65%, using RF and LDA, respectively. Results from VOC profiling of urine headspace are encouraging and suggest that there are other metabolomic avenues worth exploring which could help improve the stratification of men at risk of prostate cancer. This study also adds to our knowledge on the profile of compounds found in basified urine, from controls and cancer patients, which is useful information for future studies comparing the urine from patients with other disease states.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesDiscriminant AnalysisEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific AntigenVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID26599280
PMCPMC4657998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.