ArticlePloS one2015
Exploratory Cohort Study of Associations between Serum C - Reactive Protein and Fatigue after Stroke.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular biomarkers of cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms after stroke in late-life-enriched cohorts: a scoping review.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Post-stroke fatigue - a multidimensional problem or a cluster of disorders? A case for phenotyping post-stroke fatigue.The Journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Are central and systemic inflammation associated with fatigue in cerebral small vessel disease?International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024Article
- Increased C-Reactive Protein in Patients with Post-Stroke Depression: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Study.Alpha psychiatry · 2024Review
- Post-stroke fatigue: a review of development, prevalence, predisposing factors, measurements, and treatments.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- The Neurobiology of Pathological Fatigue: New Models, New Questions.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2022Article
- Chronic cerebral aspects of long COVID, post-stroke syndromes and similar states share their pathogenesis and perispinal etanercept treatment logic.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022Review
- Exploring the relationship between fatigue and circulating levels of the pro-inflammatory biomarkers interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in the chronic stage of stroke recovery: A cross-sectional study.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2020Article
- Inflammation, Autoimmunity, Infection, and Stroke: Epidemiology and Lessons From Therapeutic Intervention.Stroke · 2020Review
- Inflammation and the Silent Sequelae of Stroke.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimPost-stroke fatigue is a common and distressing problem but little is known about its biological mechanisms. This cohort study was to investigate associations between C-reactive protein (CRP) and fatigue after stroke.
methodsPatients were assessed at one, six and 12 months after their stroke onset, with the Fatigue Assessment Scale, a case definition of post-stroke fatigue, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and daily step counts. Blood samples were collected at each assessment and the CRP level was determined by a standard CRP immunoassay. Cross-sectional associations between CRP and fatigue at each time point were determined by Pearson correlation coefficient and independent-samples t-test. Whether CRP levels at one month predict fatigue scores at six and 12 months was explored by multiple linear regression, with anxiety, depression, and daily step counts as covariates.
resultsSixty-five patients (mean age 67 years, 65% men) were included: 61 at one month, 49 at six months, and 41 at 12 months. CRP levels and fatigue scores were not associated at one month (p = 0.88) or 12 months (p = 0.56), but weakly associated at six months (r = 0.27, p = 0.04); however, this association was no longer significant (p = 0.14) after controlling for the effects of covariates. The CRP level was not associated with the fulfilment of case definition of post-stroke fatigue at any time points (all p > 0.05). The CRP level at one month was not a significant predictor for fatigue levels at either six months (p = 0.93) or 12 months (p = 0.78).
conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence for the association between CRP and PSF in stroke patients. Future studies with larger sample sizes and controlling for potential confounders are needed to investigate whether this association exists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.