Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26598759›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2016

Comparison of hypertension healthcare outcomes among older people in the USA and England.

Alan Marshall, James Nazroo, Kevin Feeney, Jinkook Lee, Bram Vanhoutte, Neil Pendleton

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. THE HRS AROUND THE WORLD SURVEYS-A REVIEW.Journal of the economics of ageing · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Class and Health Inequality in Later Life: Patterns, Mechanisms and Implications for Policy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alan MarshallDepartment of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK.
James NazrooCathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kevin FeeneyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA Department of Demography, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Jinkook LeeRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA University of Southern California, Davis School of Gerontology, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Bram VanhoutteCathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Neil PendletonInstitute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, Clinical Sciences Building, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, UK.
University of Manchester · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Project-001R01AG017644 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INST OF NEUROLOGY · PI Andrew Steptoe · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
Integrting Information About Aging SurveysR01AG030153 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Sara Adar, Alden L. Gross · 2007 to 2026
$41.7M
Medical Research Council G1001375Medical Research Council G1001375/1NIA NIH HHS 2R01 AG030153NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017644NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe USA and England have very different health systems. Comparing hypertension care outcomes in each country enables an evaluation of the effectiveness of each system.

methodThe English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and the Health and Retirement Survey are used to compare the prevalence of controlled, uncontrolled and undiagnosed hypertension within the hypertensive population (diagnosed or measured within the survey data used) aged 50 years and above in the USA and in England.

resultsControlled hypertension is more prevalent within the hypertensive population in the USA (age 50-64: 0.53 (0.50 to 0.57) and age 65+: 0.51 (0.49 to 0.53)) than in England (age 50-64: 0.45 (0.42 to 0.48) and age 65+: 0.42 (0.40 to 0.45)). This difference is driven by lower undiagnosed hypertension in the USA (age 50-64: 0.18 (0.15-0.21) and age 65+: 0.13 (0.12 to 0.14)) relative to England (age 50-64: 0.26 (0.24 to 0.29) and age 65+: 0.22 (0.20 to 0.24)). The prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension within the hypertensive population is very similar in the USA (age 50-64: 0.29 (0.26 to 0.32) and age 65+: 0.36 (0.34 to 0.38)) and England (age 50-64: 0.29 (0.26 to 0.32) and age 65+: 0.36 (0.34 to 0.39)). Hypertension care outcomes are comparable across US insurance categories. In both countries, undiagnosed hypertension is positively correlated with wealth (ages 50-64). Uncontrolled hypertension declines with rising wealth in the USA.

conclusionsDifferent diagnostic practices are likely to drive the cross-country differences in undiagnosed hypertension. US government health systems perform at least as well as private healthcare and are more equitable in the distribution of care outcomes. Higher undiagnosed hypertension among the affluent may reflect less frequent medical contact.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAgedAgingAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareEnglandFemaleHealth SurveysHumansHypertensionLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedAntihypertensive AgentsACCESS TO HLTH CAREHealth inequalitiesPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26598759
PMCPMC4789814
OpenAlexW2172563174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.